Footnote 138:
Arist. _de Caelo_, Β, 13. 295 b 10, εἰσὶ δέ τινες οἳ διὰ τὴν ὁμοιότητά
φασιν αὐτὴν (τὴν γῆν) μένειν, ὥσπερ τῶν ἀρχαίων Ἀναξίμανδρος· μᾶλλον
μὲν γὰρ οὐθὲν ἄνω ἢ κάτω ἢ εἰς τὰ πλάγια φέρεσθαι προσήκειν τὸ ἐπὶ τοῦ
μέσου ἱδρυμένον καὶ ὁμοίως πρὸς τὰ ἔσχατα ἔχον. That Aristotle is
really reproducing Anaximander seems to be shown by the use of
ὁμοιότης in the old sense of “equality.”
[Sidenote: Animals.]
21. We have seen enough to show us that the speculations of Anaximander
about the world were of an extremely daring character; we come now to
the crowning audacity of all, his theory of the origin of living
creatures. The Theophrastean account of this has been well preserved by
the doxographers:—
Living creatures arose from the moist element as it was evaporated by
the sun. Man was like another animal, namely, a fish, in the
beginning.—Hipp. _Ref._ i. 6 (R. P. 22 a).
The first animals were produced in the moisture, each enclosed in a
prickly bark. As they advanced in age, they came out upon the drier
part. When the bark broke off,[139] they survived for a short
time.—Aet. v. 19, 1 (R. P. 22).
Further, he says that originally man was born from animals of another
species. His reason is that while other animals quickly find food by
themselves, man alone requires a lengthy period of suckling. Hence,
had he been originally as he is now, he would never have
survived.—Ps.-Plut. _Strom._ fr. 2 (R. P. _ib._).
He declares that at first human beings arose in the inside of fishes,
and after having been reared like sharks,[140] and become capable of
protecting themselves, they were finally cast ashore and took to
land.—Plut. _Symp. Quaest._ 730 f (R. P. _ib._).
Footnote 139:
This is to be understood in the light of what we are told about γαλεοί
below. Cf. Arist. _Hist. An._ Ζ, 10. 565 a 25, τοῖς μὲν οὖν σκυλίοις,
οὓς καλοῦσί τινες νεβρίας γαλεούς, ὅταν περιρραγῇ καὶ ἐκπέσῃ τὸ
ὄστρακον, γίνονται οἱ νεοττοί.
Footnote 140:
Reading ὥσπερ οἱ γαλεοί for ὥσπερ οἱ παλαιοί with Doehner, who
compares Plut. _de soll. anim._ 982 a, where the φιλόστοργον of the
shark is described. See p. 74, _n._ 141.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account