In 1489, Caxton printed two editions of an indulgence of great typographical interest. This indulgence was first noticed by Dr. Cotton, who mentions it in his _Typographical Gazetteer_ under Oxford, supposing it to have been printed at that place. Bradshaw, on seeing a photograph of it, at once conjectured from the form and appearance of the type that it was printed by Caxton, though Blades refused to accept it as a product of his press without further proof, and it was never admitted into any of his books on Caxton. The same type was afterwards found by Bradshaw used for sidenotes in the 1494 edition of the _Speculum Vite Christi_, printed by W. de Worde, and the type being in his possession at that date, could have belonged in 1489 to no one but Caxton. In a list of Caxton’s types this type would be known as type 7. In addition to these two indulgences, a number of books may be assigned to this year. The _Fayttes of Arms_ is dated; but besides this there are the _Statutes of Henry VII._, the _Governayle of Health_, the _Four Sons of Aymon_, _Blanchardyn and Eglantyne_, _Directorium Sacerdotum_, second edition, the third edition of the _Dictes or Sayengis_, the _Doctrinal of Sapience_, and an _Image of Pity_ printed on one leaf. The second edition of _Reynard the Fox_, known only from the copy preserved in the Pepysian Library, may also be assigned to this year. With the exception of the _Eneydos_, the remainder of Caxton’s books are of a religious or liturgical character. Amongst them we must class an edition probably of the _Horæ ad usum Sarum_ not mentioned by Blades; for though no copy or even fragment is now known, it is certain that such a book was printed. A set-off from a page of it was discovered by Bradshaw on a waste sheet of the _Fifteen Oes_. All that could be certainly distinguished was that it was printed in type 5, that there were twenty-two lines to a page, and that each page was surrounded by a border.