Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativitySlosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Science
Easy lessons in Einstein : $b A discussion of the more intelligible features of the theory of relativity
Slosson, Edwin E. (Edwin Emery)
Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955; Relativity (Physics)
Let us then follow Einstein and apply his Principle of Equivalence to
accelerated motion and see what it leads to. Imagine yourself shut up
inside a closed chamber, like an elevator car, somewhere out in space
away from the gravitational forces of the earth or sun. Suppose this
chamber to be rising with a constantly increasing velocity. We can,
if we want to be definite about it, assume that the chamber is a big
shell pulled up by a cable coiling around a conical windlass that hauls
it up faster all the time. Or we can assume that it is propelled from
behind by the continuous backfire of explosives, like the rocket which
Professor Goddard proposes to send to the moon. All we need is some
force, not gravitation, capable of giving the chamber every second an
additional velocity of thirty-two feet a second. Now the point is that
if you were in such an upward-moving chamber you would not know but
what you were resting on the earth. Everything would behave exactly
the same. If you now weigh one hundred and fifty pounds on the scales,
that is, if your shoe soles press down with that force, the floor of
the rising chamber would press upward with that same force and you
would not know the difference. If you let loose a ball from your hand
the floor would rise up to meet it and it would appear to fall. If you
threw the ball upward with a velocity greater than the velocity of the
chamber at the moment, the ball would rise, but since the velocity of
the chamber was constantly increasing the floor would gain on the ball
and catch up with it. This would look to you just the same as when on
earth you threw a ball into the air and it fell back to the ground,
drawn, as you are accustomed to think, by “the force of gravitation.”
But here we have no “force,” but merely a mode of motion.
Under such circumstances it would seem that all Nature conspired to
keep you in the dark. You appeal to the ether, that supposedly stable
and stationary medium that fills all space, but that also fails you.
You try the Michelson-Morley experiment to see if you are moving
through the ether or at rest on the earth but your apparatus expands or
contracts just enough to deceive you.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account