Last of all (and we apologize for this unforgivably long editorial), let us discuss the question of foreign labor. The capitalist complains that the Hungarian, "the brutal, ignorant foreigner," makes much of the trouble, and "wants as much as an American." Loud is this cry against the foreign laborer. And the ignorant, know-nothing American workman joins in the cry only too willingly. Who brings in those foreign laborers by the shipload, Mr. Mineowner? Who rounds up cargoes of Slavs on the other side and brings them here to cut the wages and the living of the native-born? Who shrieks dolefully, Mr. Miner, when the Slav shows that he is a MAN brave and willing to prove worthy of freedom by joining the army of union labor? The Slav and the Hungarian ARE HERE, and their children will be here when we are dead. Which is better, to underpay them, treat them like cattle, fill them with just hatred of unjust discrimination, or give them a chance to be men? Shall their children grow up ignorant mine slaves? Or shall they go to that factory of honest citizenship--the public school--to be improved as we have all been improved, whether we came originally from Hungary, Ireland, England, France, Russia, or elsewhere? The struggle of the strikers, like all great struggles, is sometimes unjust. It has not always the wisest or the most unselfish leaders. But it is an effort to improve the AVERAGE CONDITION OF HUMANITY. Help that effort. "LIMITING THE AMOUNT OF A DAY'S WORK" THERE'S A GOOD DEAL OF NONSENSE TALKED ON THIS SUBJECT An honest, well-meaning clergyman talked the other day on labor unions, and wandered out of his depth. As a rule, clergymen, having studied the teachings of Christ, are aware that they ought to be on the side of the workingman. Hence the strongest supporters of the union are found among the clergy. The mistake of the clergyman whom we mention is discussed here, because it is often made by well-meaning, but narrow-minded, citizens. He spoke of "the custom union labor has of limiting a day's work AND OTHER DISHONEST PRACTICES." By limiting a day's work, the reverend gentleman referred to the rule existing in certain unions regulating the maximum day's labor. That rule does exist, and sometimes undoubtedly--labor union men not being angels or cherubim--the rule may be pushed to extremes. But on the whole the rule is necessary, and it works for good. We shall tell this clergyman and other citizens one special reason for limiting the day's work.