The theory of Relativity, however, has up to the present not touched a
phenomenon that is fundamental, essential, ubiquitous in our cosmos. I
mean gravitation, the mysterious property of bodies which rules the
tiny atom no less than the most gigantic star, and directs their paths
in majestic curves.
The universal attraction which, as far as earth is concerned, we call
weight was a kind of steep-cliffed island in the sea of phenomena,
something unrelated to the rest of natural philosophy.
The Einsteinian mechanism, as we have described it up to now, passed
by this island, taking no notice of it. For that reason it was, in
this form, known as “the theory of Special Relativity.” In order to
convert it into a perfect instrument of synthesis, the phenomenon of
gravitation had to be introduced. It is thus that Einstein crowned his
work, and his system assumed the form which is well called “the theory
of General Relativity.”
Einstein has drawn gravitation from its “splendid isolation,” and has
annexed it, docile and vanquished, to the triumphal chariot of his
mechanics. He has, moreover, given Newton’s famous law a more correct
form, and experiment, the supreme judge, has declared this the only
just form.
How he did this, by what subtle and powerful chain of reasoning, by
what calculations based upon facts, I will now endeavour to tell;
and I will again do my best to avoid the network of barbed wire of
mathematical terminology.
Why did Newton, followed by the whole of classical science, believe
that gravitation, the fall of bodies, did not belong to the mechanics
of which he formulated the laws? Why, in a word, did he regard
gravitation as a force or—to use a vaguer but more general term—an
action which prevents heavy bodies from changing their positions
_freely_ in space?
_Because of the principle of inertia._ This principle, the
foundation of the whole Newtonian mechanics, may be expressed thus: a
body which is not acted upon by any force maintains its velocity and
direction unchanged.
Why do we equip steam-engines with the heavy wheels which we call
“fly-wheels,” which work nothing? Because the principle of inertia is
certainly nearly true. When the engine experiences a sudden and sharp
check, or an acceleration, the fly-wheel serves to keep it steady.
Driven by the speed it has acquired, and driving the engine in its
turn, it tends to preserve its velocity, and it prevents or modifies
accidental checks or accelerations. The principle is therefore based
upon experience, especially on the experiments of Galileo, who verified
it by rolling balls down planes inclined at different angles.
For instance, we find that a ball set in motion on a highly polished
horizontal plane keeps its direction, and would preserve its velocity
if the resistance of the atmosphere and the friction of the plane did
not gradually reduce it to zero. We find that, in proportion as we
reduce the friction, the ball tends to maintain its speed so much the
longer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account