148. Suppose that the given fraction has ciphers at the right of its
denominator; for example, ³¹/₂₅₀₀. Then annexing a cipher to the
numerator is the same thing as taking one away from the denominator;
for, (108) ³¹⁰/₂₅₀₀ is the same thing as ³¹/₂₅₀, and ³¹⁰/₂₅₀ as ³¹/₂₅.
The rule, therefore, is in this case: Take away the ciphers from the
denominator.
EXERCISES.
Reduce the following fractions to decimal fractions:
1 36 297 1
---, ----, ----, and ---.
800 1250 64 128
_Answer_, ·00125, ·0288, 4·640625, and ·0078125.
Find decimals of 6 places very near to the following fractions:
27 156 22 194 2637 1 1 3
--, ---, -----, ---, ----, ----, ---, and ---.
49 33 37000 13 9907 2908 466 277
_Answer_, ·551020, 4·727272, ·000594, 14·923076, ·266175,
·000343, ·002145, and ·010830.
149. From (121) it appears, that if two fractions have the same
denominator, the first may be divided by the second by dividing the
numerator of the first by the numerator of the second. Suppose it
required to divide 17·762 by 6·25. These fractions (138), when reduced
to a common denominator, are 17·762 and 6·250, or ¹⁷⁷⁶²/₁₀₀₀ and
⁶²⁵⁰/₁₀₀₀. Their quotient is therefore ¹⁷⁷⁶²/₆₂₅₀, which must now be
reduced to a decimal fraction by the last rule. The process at full
length is as follows: Leave out the cipher in the denominator, and
annex ciphers to the numerator, or, which will do as well, to the
remainders, when it becomes necessary, and divide as in (145).
625)17762(284192
1250
-----
5262
5000
-----
2620
2500
-----
1200
625
-----
5750
5625
-----
1250
1250
----
0
Here four ciphers have been annexed to the numerator, and one has been
taken from the denominator. Make five decimal places in the quotient,
which then becomes 2·84192, and this is the quotient of 17·762 divided
by 6·25.
150. The rule for division of one decimal by another is as follows:
Equalise the number of decimal places in the dividend and divisor,
by annexing ciphers to that which has fewest places. Then, further,
annex as many ciphers to the dividend[18] as it is required to have
decimal places, throw away the decimal point, and operate as in common
division. Make the required number of decimal places in the quotient.
[18] Or remove ciphers from the divisor; or make up the number of
ciphers partly by removing from the divisor and annexing to the
dividend, if there be not a sufficient number in the divisor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account