be divided by the square of 53·809, or, which will do as well for our
purpose, the square of 50, or 2500. The result is something less than
·00002, so that the quotient of 17·324 and 53·809 can be depended on to
four places of decimals.
[19] These are not quite correct, but sufficiently so for every
practical purpose.
153. It is required to multiply two decimal fractions together, so as
to retain in the product only a given number of decimal places, and
dispense with the trouble of finding the rest. First, it is evident
that we may write the figures of any multiplier in a contrary order
(for example, 4321 instead of 1234), provided that in the operation we
move each line one place to the right instead of to the left, as in the
following example:
2221 2221
1234 4321
---- ----
8884 2221
6663 4442
4442 6663
2221 8884
------- -------
2740714 2740714
Suppose now we wish to multiply 348·8414 by 51·30742, reserving only
four decimal places in the product. If we reverse the multiplier, and
proceed in the manner just pointed out, we have the following:
3488414
2470315 |
---------+
17442070 |
3488414|
1046524|2
24418|898
1395|3656
69|76828
----------+------
17898·1522|23188
Cut off, by a vertical line, the first four places of decimals, and
the columns which produced them. It is plain that in forming our
abbreviated rule, we have to consider only, I. all that is on the left
of the vertical line; II. all that is carried from the first column on
the right of the line. On looking at the first column to the left of
the line, we see 4, 4, 8, 5, 9, of which the first 4 comes from 4 ×
1′,[20] the second 4 from 1 × 3′, the 8 from 8 × 7′, the 5 from 8 × 4′,
and the 9 from 4 × 2′. If, then, we arrange the multiplicand and the
reversed multiplier thus,
3488414
2470315
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account