In the following examples the first two lines are the multiplicand and
multiplier; and the number of decimals to be retained will be seen from
the results.
·4471618 33·166248 3·4641016
3·7719214 1·4142136 1732·508
========= ========== ============
37719214 033166248 346410160
8161744 63124141 8052371
-------- ---------- ------------
15087686 3316625 346410160
1508768 1326650 242487112
264034 33166 10392305
3772 13266 692820
2263 663 173205
38 33 2771
30 10 ------------
--------- 2 6001·58373
1·6866591 --------
46·90415
Exercises may be got from article (143).
155. With regard to division, take any two numbers, for example,
16·80437921 and 3·142, and divide the first by the second, as far as
any required number of decimal places, for example, five. This gives
the following:
3·142)16·80437921(5·34830
15·710
-------
1·0943 |
9426 |
-----|
15177|
(A) 12568|
---- -----|-
2609 2609|9
2514 2513|6
---- ----|--
95 96|32
94 94|26
-- --|---
1 2|061
Now cut off by a vertical line, as in (153), all the figures which
come on the right of the first figure 2, in the last remainder 2061.
As in multiplication, we may obtain all that is on the left of the
vertical line by an abbreviated method, as represented at (A). After
what has been said on multiplication, it is useless to go further
into the detail; the following rule will be sufficient: To divide one
decimal by another, retaining only _n_ places: Proceed one step in
the ordinary division, and determine, by (150), in what place is the
quotient so obtained; proceed in the ordinary way, until the number of
figures remaining to be found in the quotient is less than the number
of figures in the divisor: if this should be already the case, proceed
no further in the ordinary way. Instead of annexing a figure or cipher
to the remainder, cut off a figure from the divisor, and proceed one
step with this curtailed divisor as usual, remembering, however, in
multiplying this divisor, to carry the _nearest ten_, as in (154), from
the figure which was struck off; repeat this, striking off another
figure of the divisor, and so on, until no figures are left. Since we
know from the beginning in what place the first figure of the quotient
is, and also how many decimals are required, we can tell from the
beginning how many figures there will be in the whole quotient. If the
divisor contain more figures than the quotient, it will be unnecessary
to use them: and they may be rejected, the rest being corrected as in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account