Epidemic Respiratory Disease: The pneumonias and other infections of the repiratory tract accompanying influenza and measlesOpie, Eugene L. (Eugene Lindsay)
History
Epidemic Respiratory Disease: The pneumonias and other infections of the repiratory tract accompanying influenza and measles
It is, of course, perfectly possible on the basis of the observations
presented still to regard B. influenzæ as a secondary invader which
makes its appearance in all cases of influenza simultaneously with the
onset of clinical symptoms. Final proof of its causal relationship to
the disease must depend upon the production of influenza by experimental
inoculation. Results hitherto obtained in attempts to produce the
disease experimentally have been contradictory. Pfeiffer[8] claimed to
have produced a disease in monkeys in some respects resembling influenza
by the intratracheal injection of freshly isolated cultures of B.
influenzæ. Wollstein,[19] in studies upon the pathogenicity of various
strains, has shown that B. influenzæ is generally pathogenic for mice
and guinea-pigs without respect to source or virulence for man.
Pathogenicity for rabbits and monkeys, on the other hand, was possessed
only by strains that were highly virulent for man. She furthermore
pointed out that for successful animal experimentation, it is imperative
that inoculations be carried out immediately after the isolation of the
bacilli because they rapidly lose virulence by subculture on artificial
media. It is felt that failure to appreciate these facts has been
responsible for the often repeated statement that B. influenzæ is not
pathogenic for animals.
In a series of animal experiments carried out by this commission
recorded in an appendix to this report, sixteen-hour cultures of B.
influenzæ freshly isolated from early cases of influenza were
demonstrated to be pathogenic for monkeys, both by inoculation of the
nasal and pharyngeal mucosa and by intratracheal injection. Monkeys so
inoculated developed coryza, epistaxis, tracheitis, bronchitis, and
extreme prostration. Experiments with forty-eight-hour cultures of
strains preserved by subculture during from ten to fifteen days failed
to demonstrate pathogenicity for monkeys. Proof that these monkeys had
influenza can depend only upon the demonstration that they suffered with
a disease having the clinical character and pathologic lesions of
influenza.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account