Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the SpanishFeijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Philosophy
Essays, or discourses, vol. 4 (of 4) : $b Selected from the works of Feyjoo, and translated from the Spanish
Feijoo, Benito Jerónimo
Spanish essays -- Translations into English
LXV. Perhaps some one will remark to me, that the substantial nature
of things is at a great distance from our view, and that therefore
it is not wonderful, that we have not yet penetrated into the inmost
recesses of philosophy; for that without advancing so far, we may find
sufficient matter whereon to exercise our speculations, in contemplating
the ordinary phenomena of nature, and by endeavouring to discover their
proximate causes; which attempt, may possibly be crowned with success, by
observing and reasoning upon every species of movement which is performed
by an entity, that has motion or circulation, according to the nature of
such an entity.
LXVI. I will acknowledge, that philosophy helps us to reason upon natural
phenomena, and to enquire into their more immediate causes; but in doing
this, we frequently wander in the dark, and are much exposed to be
interrupted by impediments, produced by ignorance and doubts; except it
is in the case of a few truths, the discovery of which, we owe to the
light of experience; and this fact is evinced, with respect to the very
instance of motion which has been just alledged.
LXVII. With regard to the movements of generation, corruption,
alteration, augmentation, and the rest, which are considered as distinct
from local motion, you can find nothing that is not questionable,
both in the schools of the Aristotelites, and in those of the modern
philosophers. The very definition of motion in general, which was given
by Aristotle, some reject as obscure, others as perplexed, and others
as nugatory. The movements we are now treating of, in the opinion
of Aristotle, are acquisitions of new forms, either substantial, or
accidental; but the Moderns, who deny the existence of all material
forms, object to this definition of those movements. Even among the
Aristotelites themselves, it is not agreed, whether motion is not
influenced by passion; nor whether the first, is not obedient as a
passive agent to the last. And thus in every thing else, it is all
question, and all dispute.
SECT. XVII.
LXVIII. And why should we be surprized that with respect to these
movements, which as we may say, nature executes behind the curtain,
human understanding has made so little, or next to no advances? what we
ought more to wonder at, is, that it happens the same with respect to all
local motion, which lies so plain and open to our observation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account