Essays towards the history of paintingCallcott, Maria, Lady
History
Essays towards the history of painting
Callcott, Maria, Lady
Painting -- History
[51] By Timomachus, a Byzantine contemporary with Cæsar, who was his
patron according to one passage in Pliny’s thirty-fifth book; but
other passages, with, as I think, more likelihood, make him older than
Apelles. On carefully comparing such authorities as we have on the
subject, I cannot help thinking that there were two, if not three,
painters of the name. Two seem to have been Thracians.
[52] Most probably from the Pæcile, where the pictures were not painted
in fresco, but on pannel. The portico of Octavia, with its library and
pictures, was burnt in the time of Titus.
[53] The fashion of the fine wrought cups of chalcedony is said by
Pliny to have been introduced into Rome by Pompey. B. xxxvii., c. 11.
[54] For his other various merits, see Fuseli’s first lecture.
[55] Among the pictures taken from Greece, Tiraboschi names, on the
authority of Vitruvius, b. ii. c. 8, some frescoes from Sparta; which,
by orders of the Ediles Murena and Varro, were sawn from the walls they
adorned, and, being tightly wedged in wooden cases, were transported to
Rome.
[56] Dioscorides, whose works came next in beauty to those of
Pyrgoteles, Acmon, Aulus, and some others in the time of Augustus;
Alpheus and Anthon in that of Caligula; Evodus and Necander under
Titus; Ænorus in the reign of Marcus Aurelius, &c.
[57] See the basso-relievo, of the size of life, in the Villa Albani,
and the statues in the Museum of the Capitol and the Galleries of the
Vatican.
[58] Marcus Aurelius was himself a painter: his master was, according
to Julian, Diognetes; whether the same Diognetes, who was his master in
moral philosophy, does not appear.
[59] The arch of Constantine in Rome furnishes a perfect example: such
parts as he stole from the forum of Trajan are of great merit, and do
credit to the artists of the last good school of antique sculpture.
Those portions of the decorative bas-reliefs, executed by Constantine’s
workmen, are mean and deformed--totally worthless in design and
contemptible as sculpture.
[60] Now Palestrina. See Cecconi, Historia di Palestrina.
[61] All Roman families of rank preserved the effigies of their
forefathers, some in wax, others in clay, wood, marble, or bronze.
These were carried in procession at funerals.
The images of Brutus and Cassius were not permitted to appear among
those of seventy of the principal houses of Rome, at the funeral
of Junia the widow of Cassius; but Tacitus says, that “before all
the rest THEY flashed upon men’s thoughts, the more for not being
there.”--Annals, Book iii.
The Athenians set up the statues of Brutus and Cassius along with those
of Harmodius and Aristogiton.--Dion. Cassius, Book xlvii., c. 20,
quoted by Colonel Leake.
[62] Of these, there are beautiful examples in the _Libreria_ at
Sienna, and some in the collection at Munich. The latter had not been
arranged when I saw them in 1827.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account