If the law of "the instability of the homogeneous" is a first principle,
and is a scientific induction based upon a real similarity between the
mental and material phenomena of which it is offered as an explanation,
it becomes interesting to inquire how far the similarity extends. In the
case of mental evolution the essential feature of the process is that
the mind gradually comes to perceive resemblances and to discriminate
differences which, though they were present all the time, were not at
first appreciable. In other words, the apparently homogeneous was, from
the beginning, really heterogeneous. Now this fact, which is true in the
sphere of mental evolution, finds its exact parallel in the evolution of
the material universe, if the account given above of mechanical
compounds and chemical combinations be true. What appears first in the
process of evolution, and is exemplified by mechanics, is matter
apparently inert. But when the particles of this apparently inert matter
enter into chemical combinations with one another they reveal a fresh
set of properties, quite different from those exhibited by them previous
to their combination; and, when they enter into physiological
relations, they display yet further additional properties. This
progressive manifestation it is, and not the accompanying "dissipation
of motion and integration of matter," which constitutes evolution in the
material world, and finds its exact parallel in mental evolution. In
both cases we have Will manifested as object of thought; and in both
cases we judge most truly of that which is manifested when we judge it
by its most complete manifestation. In both cases the apparent
homogeneity is not the ultimate fact underlying everything, but is only
the first-fruits of that which is yet to come.
FOOTNOTES:
[8] _First Principles_, § 46.
[9] MILL, _Inductive Logic_, bk. iii. ch. xii. p. 549.
[10] _Ibid._
[11] _First Principles_, ch. iii. § 46.
[12] SETH, _Chambers's Encyclopædia_, _s.v._ "Philosophy."
[13] KIRCHOFF, _Vorlesungen über mathematische Physik_, i. p. 1.
[14] MERTZ, _History of European Thought in the Nineteenth Century_,
i. pp. 382, 3, note.
[15] LOTZE, _Microcosmus_, E. T., ii. p. 718.
[16] LOTZE, _Microcosmus_, E. T., ii. p. 718.
[17] MILL, _Inductive Logic_, bk. iii. ch. vi.
[18] MILL, _Inductive Logic_, bk. iii. ch. vi.
[19] CLAUDE BERNARD, quoted in _L'Année Sociologique, première
année_.
[20] _Principles of Biology_, v. § 30.
[21] _Principles of Sociology_, vol. i. part ii.
[22] _Ibid._, § 260.
[23] _First Principles_, § 127.
[24] _Ibid._, § 153.
VII.
NECESSITY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account