{55b} Profess. Fid. Trident. in syllog. Confess. p. 5. {56} Matt. xvi. 18, 19. {58a} Iren. adv. hær. lib. iii. c. 3. p. 170, 171. {58b} Constit. Apost. lib. vii. c. 46. {59a} Scalig. in. Joan. xviii. 31. {59b} Concil. Trident. sess. xiii. cap. l. p. 123. {60a} Johan. Scot. in 4 sent. dist. xi. q. 3. Biel. in Can. Miss. lect. 40. Occam. Centil. lib. iv. q. 6. et in 4 sent. dist. xi. q. 6. Petr. ab. Alliac. Camerac. in 4 sent. dist. xi. q. 6. art. 1, 2. Cajet. in Th. p. 3. q. lxxv. art. l. q. xlv. art. 14. Fisher. Roffens. cont. Luther. de capt. Babyl. c. 1. {60b} Concil. Trident. sess. xxv. p. 505, 506. {60c} Trevern’s Discuss. Amic. vol. ii. p. 242. {60d} Fisher. Roffens. cont. Luther. art. xviii. Oper. p. 496. {60e} Barn. Catholico-Rom. Pacif. sect. ix. litt. D. ad fin. Paralip. {60f} Picherell. de Miss. c. ii. p. 150. {61a} Concil. Trident sess. xxv. p. 507. {61b} Petav. Dogmat. Theol. lib. xv. c. 13. n. 3. {61c} See Stillingfleet’s Rational Account of the Grounds of Protest. Relig. part. iii. chap. 3. § 19. p. 590. {61d} Albert. Pigh. Hierarch. Eccles. lib. vi. c. 1, 4. {62a} Concil. Trident. sess. v. p. 12, 13. sess. xxiii. c 3. p. 280. {62b} Pamph. p. 9, 10. For a full account of this fatal, though very true, acknowledgment, extorted from Mr. Husenbeth by my repeated demand of _distinct evidence from the writers of the three first centuries_, see my Difficulties of Roman. book i. chap. 7. 2d edit. The futile attempts of Bp. Trevern and Mr. Berington to bring, from the same early period, a shadow of testimony to their peculiarities, are, in the same Work, exposed and exploded. Should any of Mr. Husenbeth’s clerical brethren refuse to be bound by his confession, let them, if they _can_, come forward and trace their doctrines up to the Apostles through the successive writings of the Fathers of the three first centuries. {63a} Ind. Expurg. Belg. p. 54. For the original Latin, see Diff. of Rom. p. 346. 2d edit. {63b} See above, chap. ii. § III. 18. {64a} Ind. Expurg. Belg. p. 54. {64b} Hist. des Variat. livr. iv. § 32. {64c} Elfric has plainly borrowed both the turn and the sentiment of the present erased passage from Augustine. See above, chap. ii. § III. 9. (3.) {64d} See Soames’s Hist. of the Reform. vol. iii. p. 165, 166: and Stewart’s Protest. Layman. p. 322, 323, 324. {65a} Bp. Taylor’s Dissuasive from Popery, chap. i. sect. 1. {65b} See above, chap. ii. §. III. 10. (2.) {65c} Berington’s Faith of Cathol. p. 240. Trevern’s Ans. to Diffic. of Roman. p. 270. Husenbeth’s Reply to Supplem. p. 243. {66a} Cyril. Hieros. Catech. Myst. v. p. 241. Discuss. Amic. vol. ii. p. 87. {66b} Tract. de Sacram. lib. iv. c. 4. Discuss. Amic. vol. ii. p. 92. {66c} Cyprian. Epist. lv. vol. ii. p. 109, 110. {67} Berington’s Faith of Cathol. p. 355. Trevern’s Discuss. Amic. vol. ii. p. 243. {68a} Husenbeth’s Defence of the Creed and Discip. of the Cath. Church. chap. iii. p. 69.