4 0 2 0 5 0 5 3 7-1/2 0 4 0 0 1 1/2 0 1 0 ------------ ------------ ------------ 10 0 10 0 10 0 _Northill_ _Portsgrove_ _Chicksand_ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ 1-1/2 0 1 0 1/2 0 1-1/2 0 7-1/2 0 3-1/2 0 1/2 0 1 0 3 0 6-1/2 0 1/2 0 1 0 ------------ ------------ ------------ 10 0 10 0 10 0 _Eyeworth_ _Holwell_ _Odell_ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ _H._ _ V._ 9 0 3-1/2 0 4-1/2 1/3 1 0 6-1/2 0 5 1-2/3 ------------ ------------ ------------ 10 0 10 0 10 0 _Pavenham_ _Houghton Conquest_ _Dean_ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ 2-1/2 0 5 0 4 0 5 0 1/2 0 2 1/2 2-1/2 0 4-1/2 0 2 7-1/4 0 1/2 ------------- ------------- ------------- 10 0 10 0 10 0-1/4 Of these fifteen ten-hide townships, the last is selected as an instance of those slight discrepancies which creep in so easily and which account for many apparent exceptions to the rule. Passing to other multiples of the five-hide unit we have: _Oakley_ _Thurleigh_ _Blunham_ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ 4 0 0 1 4 1 1 0 1/2 0 0 1 1/2 0 1/2 0 0 1 10 0 3 0 1/2 0 ------------- ------------- ------------- 5 0 5 0 15 0 _Marston_ _Roxton_ _Dunton_ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ _H._ _V._ { 2 (less 1/2 virg.) 1 1 { 8 1 10{ 8 (plus 1/2 virg.) 0 4 10{ 1 3