Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1Lahee, Charles
History
Fifth Report of the Vestry of the Parish of Chelsea in the County of Middlesex, Appointed Under the Metropolis Local Management Act, 1855: 1860-1
Lahee, Charles
Chelsea (London, England) -- History -- 19th century; Chelsea (London, England) -- Politics and government
It now runs thus, “the word ‘drain’ shall mean and include any drain of
and used for the drainage of one building only, or premises within the
same curtilage, and made merely for the purpose of communicating with a
cesspool or other like receptacle for drainage, or with a sewer into
which the drainage of two or more buildings or premises, occupied by
different persons, is conveyed, _and shall also include any drain for
draining any group or block of houses by a combined operation_, _under
the order of any vestry or district board_.” I would suggest that the
following words be added “or under the order, sanction, or direction of
any Commissioners of Sewers, acting within the metropolis previous to the
passing of the Act for the better Local Management of the metropolis, 18
and 19 Vic. Cap. 120.”
COMBINED DRAINAGE.
PIG STY REGULATIONS.
These two matters formed the subjects of my communication to Mr. Pollard,
of the 29th ultimo, and copies of them were on the same day sent to you.
They both have reference to the amendment of the Act, and were
recommended to the vestry by Dr. Barclay, the Medical Officer of Health.
I am, Sir,
Your obedient Servant,
CHAS. LAHEE,
Vestry Clerk.
William Tite, Esq., M.P. &c. &c.
42, Lowndes Square.
* * * * *
_The Vestry Clerk to the Solicitors_.
May 2nd, 1860.
METROPOLIS LOCAL MANAGEMENT ACT AMENDMENT BILL.
Dear Sirs,—You may have observed that Mr. Tite introduced this Bill into
the House of Commons on Monday evening, consequently no time must be lost
in seeing him with reference to the following matters.
It is unfortunate that the Bill accompanying your letter of the 24th
ultimo was not the last reprint: however, I beg to send you a copy of the
last reprint, which you will observe differs in some particulars, and as
to the numbers of the clauses, from the former one.
With reference to your letter of the 24th ultimo, and the Bill
accompanying it, they were referred by the Vestry on that day to the
Committee of Works, and they met yesterday to consider them.
I beg to send you an extract from the Minutes with reference to them.
I am, dear Sirs,
Your obedient Servant,
CHAS. LAHEE,
Vestry Clerk.
Messrs. Lee and Pemberton,
44, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, W.C.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account