First harvests : $b An episode in the life of Mrs. Levison Gower : A satire without a moralStimson, Frederic Jesup
General
First harvests : $b An episode in the life of Mrs. Levison Gower : A satire without a moral
Stimson, Frederic Jesup
American fiction -- 19th century
Arthur was too inexperienced for this; for, like all young men, he also
supposed that all these characters were conventional fictions of the
stage. He did not believe in villains. Perhaps it would repay us to
formulate Arthur’s views, as those of a respectable young New Englander
of good education and bringing-up, with whose fortunes in life our book
is largely concerned. Roughly expressed, they might be put in canons,
much as follows:
I. The world is in the main desirous of realizing the greatest good of
the greatest number.
II. Unfortunate necessities--the primal curse of labor, or what
not--occupy the greater part of the time of the greater number with
sustaining life; so the leisure of the fortunate few is doubly pledged
to the discovery and attainment of the object before mentioned.
III. Money is a regrettable necessity; but its acquirement, even
from the selfish point of view, is but a means to an end. That end,
where personal, is the enjoyment of the pleasures of life--_i.e._,
literature, art, refined society, travel, and health. The larger end is
intelligent charity, or public work.
IV. Vice exists, like vermin, as a repulsive vulgarity.
V. Crime exists pathologically--_i.e._, it is either an abnormal
disease, or the consequence of a pitiable weakness.
VI. Honesty is the first virtue of the greater number; honor, which is
honesty with a flower added, is the peculiar virtue of a gentleman.
VII. Gentlemen are honorable and brave; ladies are like Shelley’s
heroines, or the ladies in the Idylls of the King.
VIII. The chiefest quality of humanity is love; and the object of all
human endeavor is to observe and avail itself of the love of that being
which is not humanity.
So much for his ethics; and, as we have said Arthur was a poet, it may
not come amiss to add an approximation of his theory of æsthetics. This
was, in brief:
IX. All beauty is the visible evidence of the love of God; nature is a
divine manifestation; and literature, art, and music are the language
in which humanity may reply. Thus, in particular, all highest poetry is
but this--the discovery of the love of God.
Such were his tenets, the standard of Arthur’s exalted moments, as
he supposed them then to be of others. In trying to live by them, he
knew that he was weak, as all men are. Of all the people whom he knew,
Gracie Holyoke alone seemed always to observe them.
So it may well be that Arthur did not, on that night, justly estimate
the worth of those about him. He had, simply, a very enjoyable dinner;
he was innocently pleased with the glitter of the glass, the sparkle of
the diamonds, the richness of the china, the beauty of the women, the
finish of their talk; it was a venial sin for him to like the food and
wines,--but there was perhaps one other ingredient in his pleasure, the
subtilest of all, which escaped him. Leaving this, for his account, let
us speak of the others.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account