Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 1 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
nor the Persian princess Statira to whom he gave his hand out of policy,
could boast that they ever influenced by one hairsbreadth the direction
of his sovereign will. As for his justice, the swift punishment that he
measured out on his return from India to those of his officers whom he
found guilty of oppression and malversation showed that under his
far-seeing eye there would be none of those abuses of delegated power
from which the satrapial system had suffered under his predecessors[61].
Modern historians have sometimes called him cruel; but in political
matters severity is often the truest mercy, and the blood that he shed
at Thebes and in Bactria probably saved a hundred times the number of
lives which unchecked rebellion would have made it necessary to
sacrifice; while the accidental and unpremeditated death of Clitus may
well be pardoned to one who found not only his dignity as man but his
royal authority wantonly outraged by a friend whom he had distinguished
by exceptional marks of kindness. In every other respect his record is
stainless. Although opposed at every step of his short career by orators
and demagogues who saw in him the only obstacle to their unrestrained
plunder of the fatherland, no legend has survived to his dishonour. On
the contrary, all that we hear of him shows us for the first time in the
world’s history a conqueror who was at the same time a just and wise
ruler, merciful to his fallen foe, scorning even in war to take mean
advantage[62], and chivalrous to the weak to a degree that his age could
neither understand nor imitate[63]. And with all this, he united in his
own person those superficial advantages which have always been quick to
win for their possessor the devotion of the mob. To a talent for
generalship which neither Hannibal, Caesar, nor any modern general has
equalled, he joined a personal bravery which often reached the level of
recklessness and was always to be found in the forefront of the hottest
battle. Whether we see him charging at the head of the Companion cavalry
in the three great battles with Darius, pursuing with a handful of his
guard the routed Persian army after Arbela, or first over the wall at
Mooltan, Alexander is always performing these feats of hardihood which
in a leader strike more than anything the imagination of his soldiers.
Add to this a generosity which made him willing to strip himself of his
possessions to enrich his friends, a personal delight in that pomp and
pageantry which forms the most direct road to the hearts of the
proletariat, and a form, face and figure so distinguished that their one
defect was for centuries after imitated by all who wished to be thought
models of manly beauty[64], and we can no longer wonder that his
contemporaries looked upon him as more than human. This wise and
provident ruler of the world that he had conquered was at the same time
a youth beautiful as Apollo, chivalrous as Bayard, clean as Galahad. Is
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account