Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)Legge, Francis
Religion
Forerunners and rivals of Christianity : $b being studies in religious history from 330 B.C. to 330 A.D., Vol. 2 (of 2)
Legge, Francis
Christianity and other religions; Religions
of the Cabiri of Samothrace, and finally those celebrated at Eleusis,
pointing out many things which he considers as indicating the Ophites’
own peculiar doctrine on this point[197]. That he considers the god
worshipped in all these different mysteries to be one and the same
divinity seems plain from a hymn which he quotes as a song of “the great
Mysteries,” and which the late Prof. Conington turned into English
verse[198]. So far as any sense can be read into an explanation made
doubly hard for us by our ignorance of what really took place in the
rites the Ophite writer describes, or of any clear account of his own
tenets, he seems to say that the many apparently obscene and sensual
scenes that he alludes to, cover the doctrine that man’s soul is part of
the universal soul diffused through Nature and eventually to be freed
from all material contact and united to the Deity; whence it is only
those who abstain from the practice of carnal generation who can hope to
be admitted to the highest heaven[199]. All this is illustrated by many
quotations not only from the heathen poets and philosophers, but also
from the Pentateuch, the Psalms, the Jewish Prophets, and from the
Canonical Gospels and St Paul’s Epistles.
The connection of such a system with orthodox Christianity seems at
first sight remote enough, but it must be remembered that Hippolytus was
not endeavouring to explain or record the Ophite beliefs as a historian
would have done, but to hold them up to ridicule and, as he describes
it, to “refute” them. Yet there can be no doubt that the Ophites were
Christians or followers of Christ who accepted without question the
Divine Mission of Jesus, and held that only through Him could they
attain salvation. The difference between them and the orthodox in
respect to this was that salvation was not, according to them, offered
freely to all, but was on the contrary a magical result following
automatically upon complete initiation and participation in the
Mysteries[200]. Texts like “Strait is the way and narrow is the gate
that leadeth into eternal life” and “Not every one that saith unto me
Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven” were laid hold of by
them as showing that complete salvation was confined to a few highly
instructed persons, who had had the sense to acquire the knowledge of
the nature of the Deity and of the topography of the heavenly places
which underlay the ceremonies of the Mysteries. Such an one, they said
after his death would be born again not with a fleshly but with a
spiritual body and passing through the gate of heaven would become a
god[201]. It does not follow, however, that those who did not obtain
this perfect _gnosis_ would be left, as in some later creeds, to
reprobation. The cry of “all things in heaven, on earth, and below the
earth[202]” that the discord of this world[203] might be made to cease,
which the Naassene author quoted by Hippolytus daringly connects with
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account