The Democratic party, to be sure, redeemed itself later under the
splendid leadership of President Wilson, but at that time, while we
recognized the evil of the theory, we seemed to have sunk into a
sordid acquiescence in the fact; everybody thought the tariff wrong,
but nobody wished to have it done away with so long as there was a
chance, to speak in modern American, for him to get in on the graft.
The word “graft” was unknown in those days, by all save those thieves
in whose argot it was found and devoted to its present general use in
the vocabulary. I suppose it is in the dictionary by this time. In any
event, it is not strange that the word should have become so current,
since for a while we made a national institution of the very thing it
connotes.
There was, however, then and always, the labor question, and we were
beginning to discover that that is fundamental, perhaps the one great
fundamental,--aside from the complication of evil and good that is
inherent and implicit in humanity itself,--since the burning question
is and always will be how the work of the world is to be got done, and,
what is a much more embarrassing problem, who is to do it. Many of the
men who had been doing that work, or the heaviest of it, were striking
in Illinois in those years.
The shots the Pinkertons had fired at Homestead echoed in the state;
Senator Palmer had made a great speech about it in the Senate; and
perhaps the tariff had something to do with that, since tariffs on
steel have not been unknown. But there were shots fired nearer home,
first in the strike among the men who were digging the drainage canal,
then among the miners in the soft coal fields of the state, then the
strike in the model town of Pullman, and the great railroad strike that
grew out of it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account