The question of the hour in France is militarism and anti-militarism.
The emotions roused by this fierce duel between these two parties of
the nation are poignant and absorbing, and threaten us ever with civil
war. It is impossible to blink away all the perils and grievances and
wrong-doing in which the final triumph of militarism could involve
France; and still less possible to deny the sad fact that a large
proportion of the country are in favour of military triumph. This fact
is mainly due to the infamous campaign of a Press with little instinct
of honour or truth, which persuades the unthinking multitude that the
salvation of France lies in the hands of a group of unscrupulous and
incompetent generals who, since Sedan, have not done anything to justify
the extraordinary confidence reposed in them by their credulous and
easily fooled countrymen.
[Illustration: A REVIEW AT LONGCHAMP]
Thanks to Napoleon, the French are unable to bear defeat. The race is a
nervous, excitable one, susceptible to great moments of dejection, and
easily plunged into terror under the influence of anxiety. They have not
recovered from the effects of ’70, and their souls are still stamped with
the horrors of that terrible year. They wince at the memory of Sedan,
and have only been able to check the depressing work of remembrance by
a buoyant conviction in the near hour of vengeance. For years they have
fed upon the hope of the _revanche_. Only a general can give them this
desired satisfaction, they believe, and hence their absurd worship of
their army, and their still more absurd readiness to fling themselves
under the feet of any soldier who will fool them with tall talk, and
intimidate them with the discovery of traitors. Their apprehension of
treason in their own midst is one of the most significant symptoms of
demoralisation. According to the modern French, every man seems to have
his price, and every Frenchman is only longing for an opportunity to
sell his country. Not even the Chinese have an intenser distrust of the
foreigner. In the lamentable _Affaire Dreyfus_, the immense majority
were honestly convinced that the nations of the world (Spain excepted)
were banded together to work the ruin of France, and cast shame upon
her army. They knew the figures paid to the Czar, their ally, to the
Emperor of Germany, and to the King of Italy by the Jews. England as
a rich country was supposed to be one of the paymasters of Europe in
its unequal struggle against the honour of France. It was the _Affaire
Dreyfus_ that revealed to the amazed world the sudden passion of the
French people for its army. The army saw its opportunity, seized it, and
may now be said to be in revolt against the nation. Let us be in no doubt
of the fact that France does not desire a military dictator, and that
such a dictatorship would be the very worst calamity that could happen
to her. It is easy enough to detect the wire-pullers behind a parcel
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account