1st. When we lay bare a hollow muscle, the heart, the stomach, or the intestines, and empty it entirely of the substances that it contains, it contracts and dilates alternately as when it is full, if we apply an external stimulant to it. 2d. If we empty by punctures all the great vessels which go to the heart, or come from it, so as to evacuate it entirely, its alternate dilatations and contractions continue for some time. 3d. In order to judge comparatively of the degree of force of the contraction and the dilatation, we can extract two hearts nearly equal in size from two living animals; place immediately the fingers of one hand into the auricles or the ventricles of the first, and grasp with the other hand the exterior of the second; you will feel that one makes as great an effort in dilating as the other does in contracting. This fact already observed by Pechlin, is so much the more remarkable, as the effort of dilatation is often greater than that of contraction. I have even observed, in repeating this experiment, that whatever effort we make with the hand, we cannot prevent the organ from dilating. 4th. The alternate extension and contraction, from which arises the vermicular motion of the intestines, is seen during hunger when we open the abdomen of an animal. 5th. The hardness of the organic muscular texture is as evident during dilatation as during vacuity. 6th. I have many times observed that at the instant in which I irritated the heart with the point of a scalpel, that a dilatation was the first consequence of it, and that contraction was only consequent to it. It happens in general more often that contraction begins the motions in our experiments; but certainly, the muscle being at rest, it is frequently a dilatation that first manifests itself. It appears then very probable that the dilatation of the organic muscles is a phenomenon as vital as their contraction; that these two states are united in a necessary manner; that both of them compose muscular motion, of which contraction is but one part. Who knows even if each may not be disturbed separately, if to a regular contraction may not succeed an irregular dilatation and vice versa? Who knows if certain alterations in the pulse do not belong to injuries of dilatation and others to those of contraction? I am far from being certain; for in medicine we must rest our belief on certainty and not on presumption; but we can make this point an object of research.