Brock, Isaac, Sir, 1769-1812; Canada -- History -- 1763-1867; United States -- History -- War of 1812
Public opinion in England was so occupied with affairs in the
Peninsula and political dissensions at home that it did not concern
itself with distant Canada, or even with the standing quarrel with
the {120} United States. The new president, James Madison, while
removing the embargo, still held to non-intercourse with France and
England, their colonies or dependencies. The Non-Intercourse Bill,
brought in by the committee on foreign relations and passed by
congress, excluded all public and private vessels of France and
England from American waters, and forbade, under severe penalties,
the importation of British or French goods. It was at this time that
one John Henry, was sent by Ryland, on behalf of the governor-general
of Canada, into the New England States to report on the state of
public opinion there with regard to internal politics and the
probability of war. It was supposed then that the Federalists of
Massachusetts, rather than submit to the difficulties they were
subjected to, would bring about a separation from the union. Henry's
letters, unimportant in themselves, afterwards came into the
possession of the government of the United States, and were made use
of to foment the war feeling of 1812.
[Sidenote: New order-in-council]
Early in 1809 Canning had sent instructions to the British minister
in Washington, Mr. Erskine, to offer to withdraw the
orders-in-council on certain conditions. The minister exceeded his
instructions, and announced in April that the orders of 1807 would be
withdrawn, in respect to the United States, on June 10th. There was
universal joy and satisfaction throughout that country at the
resumption of trade. A thousand ships {121} hurried out of the
harbours laden with merchandise for British ports. The French
minister at Washington remonstrated at the hasty belief in promises,
and it was soon found that the announcement was premature. The
conditions attached to the withdrawal had not been insisted upon by
the English envoy, and on the very day, June 10th, that the
revocation of the order was arranged for, it was learned in America
that on April 26th another order-in-council had been passed by
England establishing a strict blockade of the ports of Holland,
France, and Italy.[1] British merchants, frightened at the prospect
of free entrance of American ships to the Baltic, had crowded the
board of trade protesting that if American vessels with cheaper
sugar, cotton, and coffee were allowed into Amsterdam and Antwerp,
British trade was at an end. Their warehouses were stuffed full, and
they could not stand American competition and the resulting fall in
prices. Relations with the United States were more strained than
ever. Smuggling during these years of restriction seems to have
flourished everywhere, and the island of Heligoland was the chief
depot for English traders in the Baltic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account