Geological facts; or, the crust of the earth, what it is, and what are its usesBarrett, W. G. (William Garland)
Religion
Geological facts; or, the crust of the earth, what it is, and what are its uses
Barrett, W. G. (William Garland)
Geology
CHAPTER VII.
SECONDARY FORMATIONS.
_No. 1. The New Red Sandstone._
“There is a path which no fowl knoweth, and which the vulture’s eye hath
not seen; the lions’ whelps have not trodden it, nor the fierce lion
passed by it.”—JOB.
We now take our leave of the Palæozoic period, and enter upon the
investigation of other and more recent geological epochs in the history
of the crust of our planet. This division is known by the names
Secondary or Mesozoic,[64] and is inclusive of the New Red Sandstone,
Oolitic, Wealden, and Cretaceous groups. If, in our previous survey, we
have had our minds filled with wonder as we looked at the disinterred
relics of past creations, and have gazed at these fossil forms of
ancient life with almost a loving interest in their still remaining
beauty; so, as we now study higher types of life, and behold how “other
wonders rise, and seize the soul the prisoner of amaze,” we shall find
reason upon reason for the penetration of our minds with the profoundest
adoration of Deity. No man turning up a tumulus, and there finding
coins, weapons, beads, vases, or other such historical relics, would
venture to say such things were created there; on the contrary, he would
acknowledge that they were Roman, and that he had come to that
conclusion by perceiving their resemblance to other and similar ancient
Roman relics, discovered where there could be no doubt of their origin
and history. Or if a traveller were to visit the cities of Herculaneum
and Pompeii, and there find buried beneath the overwhelming torrent of
once burning lava, all possible kinds of human memorials, not only in
human _works_, but also in the skeleton remains of human _beings_, would
he not come to the conclusion that these were indubitable evidences of
those cities having once been inhabited by man, and that these skeletons
were once covered with warm flesh, and that they had lived, and moved,
and had their being, even as we do now, amidst the activities and
enjoyments of actual life? We apply this to geology. There are persons
who never judge by _evidence_, (though what else have we to judge by?)
but rashly jump to conclusions about geological facts, that have not a
particle of common sense to sustain them. They never think that every
rounded pebble they meet with has been so rounded by the action of
water; they imagine sand to have been created as sand, instead of taking
the geologist’s proof, that all sand has been produced by the action of
moving water on solid rock. They believe that fossils were created, and
that God put encrinital remains, and dead ammonites, and bones of
saurians, and teeth and bones of great mammals, in the earth, just as we
find them in the cliffs and caves of this and every country; and they
imagine that thus to account for the wonders of creation redounds to the
glory of that God whom thus they ignorantly worship. Even our great
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account