Geological Observations on South AmericaDarwin, Charles
Science
Geological Observations on South America
Darwin, Charles
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Geology -- South America; Mollusks, Fossil -- South America; Paleontology
F. This is the surface-plain, and is continuously united with that
which stretches like a fringe along the coast. In ascending the valley
it gradually becomes narrower, and is at last, at the distance of about
ten miles from the sea, reduced to a row of flat-topped patches on the
sides of the mountains. None of the lower terraces extend so far up the
valley.)
We come now to the terraces on the opposite sides of the east and west
valley of Coquimbo: the section in Figure 10 is taken in a north and
south line across the valley at a point about three miles from the sea.
The valley measured from the edges of the escarpments of the upper
plain FF is about a mile in width; but from the bases of the bounding
mountains it is from three to four miles wide. The terraces marked with
an interrogative do not exist on that side of the valley, but are
introduced merely to render the diagram more intelligible.
These five terraces are formed of shingle and sand; three of them, as
marked by Captain B. Hall (namely, B, C, and F), are much more
conspicuous than the others. From the marine remains copiously strewed
at the mouth of the valley on the lower terraces, and southward of the
town on the upper one, they are, as before remarked, undoubtedly of
marine origin; but within the valley, and this fact well deserves
notice, at a distance of from only a mile and a half to three or four
miles from the sea, I could not find even a fragment of a shell.
ON THE INCLINATION OF THE TERRACES OF COQUIMBO, AND ON THE UPPER AND
BASAL EDGES OF THEIR ESCARPMENTS NOT BEING HORIZONTAL.
The surfaces of these terraces slope in a slight degree, as shown by
the sections in Figures 9 and 10 taken conjointly, both towards the
centre of the valley, and seawards towards its mouth. This double or
diagonal inclination, which is not the same in the several terraces,
is, as we shall immediately see, of simple explanation. There are,
however, some other points which at first appear by no means
obvious,—namely, first, that each terrace, taken in its whole breadth
from the summit-edge of one escarpment to the base of that above it,
and followed up the valley, is not horizontal; nor have the several
terraces, when followed up the valley, all the same inclination; thus I
found the terraces C, E, and F, measured at a point about two miles
from the mouth of the valley, stood severally between fifty-six to
seventy-seven feet higher than at the mouth. Again, if we look to any
one line of cliff or escarpment, neither its summit-edge nor its base
is horizontal. On the theory of the terraces having been formed during
a slow and equable rise of the land, with as many intervals of rest as
there are escarpments, it appears at first very surprising that
horizontal lines of some kind should not have been left on the land.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account