Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth centuryAnonymous
History
Glimpses of the dark ages : $b or, Sketches of the social condition of Europe, from the fifth to the twelfth century
Anonymous
Civilization, Medieval
Some have maintained that the benefices granted, in the way
described, were originally revocable by the lord at pleasure, and
that it was not till some time afterwards that an hereditary interest
was possessed by the tenant; but Mr. Hallam, whose learning and
judgment in such matters are equally admirable, questions this, and
believes that hereditary fiefs obtained in many instances, from the
beginning. Subinfeudation, or the parcelling out a territory to a
number of under-tenants, was an early result, proceeding from the
possession of hereditary benefices. Traces of this practice are
found in the times of Pepin, king of France; they are more numerous
under Charlemagne; and in later times they are so general as to prove
that the custom was nearly universal. Thus two classes of fiefs
arose--the _royal_, or principal fiefs, held immediately from the
crown; and the _arrière_, or subordinate fiefs, which were dependent
upon the nobility. The parties who had received their fiefs from the
king swore allegiance to him as their lord; and they, in their turn,
exacted a similar oath of fidelity from their own tenants.
Still, only some part of the property of a country was held on the
feudal tenure; a considerable part remained allodial, or free. But
what guarantee had the proprietor for quiet possession? A number of
small landholders found themselves surrounded by mighty chieftains,
whose estates were extensive, and whose power was increased by the
number of vassals they gathered about them through the practice of
subinfeudation. In an age when the spirit of justice was scarcely
known--when law furnished no shield of protection--the freeholder was
constantly exposed to the oppression of his haughty neighbours. If
some feudal baron cast his eye upon the field of the allodialist, as
Ahab did on Naboth's vineyard, it was in vain for the proprietor to
resist. It was better to yield it up to him at once, as a feudal
estate, and to occupy it as a fief incident to certain services, than
to have it taken away altogether, or even subjected to depredation
and pillage. Beside, in seasons of anarchy and war, when foreign
enemies invaded a kingdom, or rapacious lords issued from their
castles to gather a harvest of spoil, the possessor of an independent
estate felt that if he would keep what he had, it would be better for
him to put himself and his estate under the wing of feudalism, and
thus secure the only kind of protection which the times afforded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account