Good Health and How We Won It, With an Account of the New HygieneSinclair, Upton
Science
Good Health and How We Won It, With an Account of the New Hygiene
Sinclair, Upton
Hygiene
The case of food reform against fish would merely lead to the relating
of the arguments against meat. Fish contains nearly seven per cent. of
uric acid. It is exposed like meat to the presence of tape worms and
other parasites. Even when fresh out of the water its flesh is filled
with fatigue poisons, the result of its struggles to escape from the
net or the hook; and Mosso of Turin and other authorities have shown
that these fatigue toxins have a bad effect upon the body. No food will
so quickly decompose and putrefy as fish, and unless perfectly fresh it
will always be found full of the putrefactive bacteria which are the
active agents in causing autointoxication.
It may be stated, however, that the person who follows that careful
and helpful mode of eating recommended and practiced with such marked
benefits by Horace Fletcher and his converts, will assuredly minimize
the dangers that lurk unsuspected by the uninformed in many of our
commonly used foods, and will derive a greater benefit from all food
than it is possible for those to gain who eat in the hasty and careless
fashion characteristic of most Americans.
VII
HOW OFTEN SHOULD WE EAT?
WE have discussed the question how to eat and what to eat; there
remains the question of when to eat. English people, as a rule, eat
four meals a day. The French are practically a two meal a day nation,
eating a very light breakfast.
Of late years there has been a strong tendency on the part of American
dieticians to advocate a reduction in the number of daily meals, the
ideal aimed at being the establishing of the custom of two meals a day,
with at least six hours intervening between them.
It may be asked whether appetite is not a safe guide to follow, and
whether it is not the part of wisdom to follow personal inclination
in the choice and quantity and number of meals. Does not a study of
dietetic customs and habits definitely decide the essential rules of
dietetics? While it is true that habits and customs are very strong
factors in everybody’s life, yet it is also true that they are
very unreliable guides. We are constantly acquiring new habits, and
sloughing off old ones; and even the most deeply impressed of habits
may be changed for others. And while the common customs of mankind
would seem to indicate that three or four meals a day is the rule,
at least among civilized nations, yet the facts are that the most
primitive people take one meal a day, and the great majority of people
in the world, as a rule, eat certainly less than three.
TWO MEALS A DAY THE BEST
Physiological facts argue for the two meal plan, or else for very light
and easily digested food, if an extra meal be taken.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account