Gout, with a section on ocular disease in the goutyLlewellyn, Llewellyn J. (Llewellyn Jones)
Science
Gout, with a section on ocular disease in the gouty
Llewellyn, Llewellyn J. (Llewellyn Jones)
Eye -- Diseases; Gout
In justification of these strictures, may I cite some opinions as to
the frequency of gout in the United States. In 1890, Sir Dyce Duckworth
affirmed that in America gout was “practically unknown.” But a few
years later, we find Sir William Osier convinced that gout was often
_unrecognised_ in the United States. More pertinent still, only twenty
years after Duckworth’s affirmation, Luff quoted the statistics of the
Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, from which it appeared that during a
period of fourteen years 0·26 per cent. of the total admissions thereto
were examples of gout. This he contrasts with the number of cases of gout
admitted to St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, during a similar period.
_Mirabile dictu_, the percentage was only 0·37, but a third more than
that of the Johns Hopkins Hospital!
Yet again, J. H. Pratt, of Boston, writing in 1916, observes “the
greatest confusion exists in the minds of many practitioners in America
to-day regarding this disease (gout) and its diagnosis. In some parts
of the country the diagnosis is frequently made in conditions that are
not gout; in other sections there seems to be a skepticism in the minds
of many practitioners regarding the existence of such a disease. In
New England I have found that chronic gout, even when tophi occur, is
often mistaken for rheumatism or arthritis deformans. Some physicians
of large experience assert that they see gout frequently. Enquiry has
shown that they mistake typical cases of arthritis deformans for gout,
and the swellings about the joints and even Heberden’s nodes for ‘gouty’
deposits.”
Can it for one moment be denied that even to ourselves, living in
England, the so-called “home of gout,” these trenchant criticisms are
but too applicable. So long, then, as such confusion exists as to what
does and what does not constitute gout, how can we, with any show of
scientific precision, presume to discuss, much less lay down, dogmatic
statements as to the geographical distribution and the race incidence of
gout?
_Food, Drink, and Occupation._—Gout, it has been well said, is the
“Nemesis of high living,” for, unquestionably _overeating_ is most
fertile in evoking any latent tendency thereto. Attempts to throw all the
blame on particular foodstuffs, _e.g._, red meats, etc., on the ground
that these highly nitrogenous substances engender excessive formation of
uric acid, have failed of their object. Even the much-maligned “purin
bodies” have of late been largely absolved of blame, and the virtues
of a “purin-free” diet, _e.g._, milk, are probably referable to the
_intestinal asepsis_ that such a regimen promotes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account