Biology -- Greece -- History; Medicine, Greek and Roman
With the death of Theophrastus about 287 B. C. pure biological science
substantially disappears from the Greek world, and we get the same
type of deterioration that is later encountered in other scientific
departments. Science ceases to have the motive of the desire to know,
and becomes an applied study, subservient to the practical arts. It
is an attitude from which in the end applied science itself must
suffer also. Yet the centuries that follow were not without biological
writers of very great ability. In the medical school of Alexandria
anatomy and physiology became placed on a firm basis from about 300
B. C., but always in the position subordinate to medicine that they
have since occupied. Two great names of that school, Herophilus
and Erasistratus, we must consider elsewhere.[83] Their works have
disappeared and we have the merest fragments of them. In the last
pre-Christian and the first two post-Christian centuries, however,
there were several writers, portions of whose works have survived and
are of great biological importance. Among them we include Crateuas, a
botanical writer and illustrator, who greatly developed, if he did not
actually introduce, the method of representing plants systematically by
illustration rather than by description. This method, important still,
was even more important when there was no proper system of botanical
nomenclature. Crateuas by his paintings of plants, copies of which have
not improbably descended to our time, began a tradition which, fixed
about the fifth century, remained almost rigid until the rediscovery
of nature in the sixteenth. He was physician to Mithridates VI Eupator
(120-63 B. C.), but his work was well known and appreciated at Rome,
which became the place of resort for Greek talent.[84]
[83] See the companion chapter on _Greek Medicine_.
[84] The works of Crateuas have recently been printed by M. Wellmann
as an appendix to the text of Dioscorides, _De re medica_, 3 vols.,
Berlin, 1906-17. The source and fate of his plant drawings are
discussed in the same author’s _Krateuas_, Berlin, 1897.
Celsus, who flourished about 20 B. C., wrote an excellent work on
medicine, but gives all too little glimpse of anatomy and physiology.
Rufus of Ephesus, however, in the next century practised dissection
of apes and other animals. He described the decussation of the optic
nerves and the capsule of the crystalline lens, and gave the first
clear description that has survived of the structure of the eye. He
regarded the nerves as originating from the brain, and distinguished
between nerves of motion and of sensation. He described the oviduct of
the sheep and rightly held that life was possible without the spleen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account