H.M.I.: Some Passages in the Life of One of H.M. Inspectors of SchoolsSneyd-Kynnersley, E. M. (Edmund McKenzie)
History
H.M.I.: Some Passages in the Life of One of H.M. Inspectors of Schools
Sneyd-Kynnersley, E. M. (Edmund McKenzie)
Education -- Great Britain; School management and organization -- Great Britain
We were “My Lords”! Probably some Hanoverian monarch had imported the
title from Germany, and had applied it to a Committee of the Privy
Council. Under this sign they conquered. It took the place of the
kingly and editorial WE. It called up a vision of phantasmal, coroneted
heads, shaking a negative, more rarely nodding an affirmative. In
front there might seem to be a Secretary, an Assistant Secretary,
even a clerk: but when the suppliant got as far as “What ho! Arrest
me that agency,” the official vanished, and there was but a voice,
“My Lords regret.” “And so the vision fadeth.” With this weapon they
put to silence inquisitive members of the Opposition, who “wanted to
know” things better unknown: with this they conquered School Boards
and school managers of all denominations: with this they even tried to
intimidate H.M. Inspectors themselves, who well knew that it was no
lion that roared, but only Snug the joiner.
My Lords were but a Parliamentary fiction; in theory composed of the
Lord President, the First Lord of the Treasury, and some Secretaries
of State: in practice they had no existence; but I think the Whitehall
staff had by long “making believe” persuaded themselves that they were
flesh and blood. A newly appointed examiner would go to his immediate
superior with a letter from the School Board of Swaggerby, protesting
against a deduction of one-tenth from the annual grant paid in respect
of the Slum Street Board School: how should he reply?
“Pooh, pooh: it’s Article 32, c. (3): tell them to go to the deuce.”
And the beardless stripling would sit down, and write:--
“Adverting to your letter of the 24th inst., I am directed to inform
you that My Lords regret that They are unable to reconsider Their
decision in the matter. I am to refer you to Art. 32, c. (3) of the
Code; and I am to add that Their Lordships will look for a marked
improvement in the results of the next examination as a condition of
the payment of any further grant.”
The capital letter prefixed to the third personal pronoun always seemed
to me the height of impertinent arrogance. But the examiners enjoyed
it immensely; and I am convinced that, if they ever went to church and
heard the petition in the Litany supplicating wisdom and understanding
for the Lords of the Council, they mentally added, “Meaning US, though
WE are already well supplied.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account