Helmet and spear : $b stories from the wars of the Greeks and RomansChurch, Alfred John
History
Helmet and spear : $b stories from the wars of the Greeks and Romans
Church, Alfred John
Greece -- History, Military; Rome -- History, Military
The van of the attacking force made its way across the stream in fair
order. The river-bed was rough, full of great stones brought down by
floods and with here and there a dangerously deep hole, but there was
no mud or treacherous sand. The first assault was checked. A line
of dismounted troopers stood in the water, wherever it was shallow
enough to allow it; on the bank itself was a mass of horsemen, two or
three files deep. The combatants below plied their swords; those on
the higher ground showered javelins on the advancing foe. Only a few
of these could struggle up the somewhat steep bank; of the few some
were slain, others thrust back upon the troops that followed them. The
attack seemed to have failed. But when the king himself took up the
attack the fortunes of the day were rapidly changed. For the first of
many times throughout his marvellous career the personal courage of
Alexander, his strength, his dexterity in arms, turned the tide of
battle. He was a matchless soldier as well as a matchless general, and
seemed to combine the old soldiership and the new, the personal prowess
of an Achilles and the tactical skill of an Epaminondas. He sprang
forward, rallying, as he advanced, his disheartened troops, struck
down adversary after adversary, and climbed the bank with astonishing
agility. The example of such a leader seemed to give the Companions an
irresistible strength. In a few minutes the bank of the Granicus was
won. But the battle was not yet over. The Persians had been beaten back
from their first line of defence; but they still held the level ground,
and till the whole of the Greek army had crossed the stream they had a
great superiority in numbers, enabling them to deliver charges which
the weight of men and horses might well have made irresistible. Again
Alexander was in the thick of the conflict. His pike had been broken in
the struggle for the bank. He asked his orderly for another. The man
showed him his own broken weapon. Then the king looked round to his
followers, holding high the splintered shaft. The appeal was answered
in an instant. It was a Corinthian, Demaratus by name, who answered
his call and supplied him with a fresh lance. It was not done a moment
too soon. The Persian cavalry charged in a heavy column, its leader,
Mithradates, son-in-law to King Darius, riding a long way in front
of his men. Alexander spurred his horse, charged at Mithradates with
levelled pike, struck him in the face, and hurled him dying to the
ground. Meanwhile another Persian noble had ridden up. He struck a
fierce blow at Alexander with his scymetar, but missing his aim in his
excitement, did nothing more than shear off the crest of the helmet.
Alexander replied with a thrust which broke through his breastplate and
inflicted a mortal wound. There was a third antagonist behind, but his
arm was severed by a sword-cut from a Macedonian officer just as he was
in the act of delivering a blow. The struggle, however, was continued
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account