English fiction -- 20th century; Lancashire (England) -- Fiction
EDWARD’S “fat elephant” drove from Hepplestall’s meditating his retort
to Reuben’s intransigeancy. He held that it was necessary to weld the
manufacturers into a solid phalanx of opposition to the legalizing
of Trade Unions, and that if Reuben were allowed to stand out, other
masters, whom Needham regarded as weak-kneed, would stand out with him.
Needham was obstinate and unscrupulous, with a special grudge against
“kid-gloved” Hepplestall, and if there were no overt manifestations of
discontent in Hepplestall’s factory, his business was to provoke them.
There was surely latent discontent there as everywhere else and the
good days of Sidmouth and Castlereagh had shown what could be achieved
in the way of manufacturing riot by the use of informers. Informers
were paid to inform, and lost their occupation if no information were
forthcoming; they did not lose their occupation; they were agents
provocateurs, and Gentleman Hepplestall was, if Needham knew right from
left, to be thwacked into line by the activities of an informer.
He hadn’t much difficulty--he was that sort of man--in laying hands
upon a suitable instrument. The name of the instrument was Thomas
Barraclough, and it was, indeed, in Needham’s hands already working as
a weaver in his factory, not, to be sure, for the purpose of provoking
unrest there but merely for decent spying. There is honesty in spying as
in other things and the decent spy is the observer and reporter of what
others do spontaneously; the indecent spy is he who instigates the deeds
he afterwards reports. Barraclough was quite willing, for a higher
fee, to undertake to prove to Hepplestall that Trade Unions were murder
clubs.
The affair was not stated, even by blunt Needham to his spy, with quite
such candor as this, but, “If tha’ sees signs o’ trouble yonder, tell me
of ’em; and if tha’ sees no signs tha’s blinder than I tak’ thee
for,” was a sufficiently plain direction to an intelligent spy,
and Barraclough nodded comprehendingly as he went off to begin his
cross-country tramp to Hepplestall’s.
A spy who looks like a spy is disqualified at once, but what are the
symptoms of spying? What signs does spying hang out on a man that we
shall know him for a spy? Is he bent with a life spent in crouching at
key holes? A keen-eyed, large-eared ferret of a man? The fact is that
Barraclough was small and bent, and ferretty, that he looked like your
typical spy and yet did not look, in the Lancashire of those days, any
different from a famished weaver. They were “like boys of fifteen and
sixteen and most of them cannot measure more than 5 feet 2 or 3 inches.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account