Hermione and Her Little Group of Serious ThinkersMarquis, Don
General
Hermione and Her Little Group of Serious Thinkers
Marquis, Don
Satire; Superficiality -- Fiction; Young women -- Fiction
But I restrain it. One must, you know. The
loveliest man gave us such an interesting talk on
self-restraint the other evening.
And now I always ask myself the last thing be-
fore I go to bed at night: "Have I restrained my-
self today? Or have I failed?"
There is no real culture without restraint, you know.
That's where the English are so superior, don't
you think?
I met the loveliest Englishman the other evening.
The moment I saw him I said to myself he
was one of the aristocracy. Other people have
noses like theirs, of course, but it is only the
English aristocracy who can CARRY that kind of a nose.
And my intuition was correct -- there are only
five lives between him and a title, and one of those
is a polo player and another is at the front.
Someone told me his family were paying him
not to go home, but what they think the poor man
would do if he were in England I don't know,
because they don't duel there, you know. If they
dueled there, of course, he might dispose of all
five lives.
Don't you think those old European families are
so, so -- well, so ROMANTIC somehow?
STIMULATING INFLUENCES
SCIENCE and philanthropy should go hand in
hand -- two hearts that beat as one, if you
know what I mean, and all that sort of thing.
And they do, too. We were discussing it the
other evening -- our Little Group of Serious
Thinkers, you know -- and we decided that what
philanthropy owes to science is made up by what
science owes to philanthropy.
Isn't it wonderful how things balance like that?
There's the Twilight Sleep and the Mother-
Teacher Idea, for instance.
Our little group are thinking of starting a
propaganda to urge ALL Teachers to be Mothers.
And, of course, a lot of them might object -- but
along comes the Twilight Sleep and takes away all
POSSIBLE objections.
And along comes Philanthropy to put the Twilight
Sleep within the reach of all -- at least, we
hope it will -- and we're going to take the matter up
with some of the Philanthropists right away.
Isn't it just simply WONDERFUL how Modern
Thought brings subjects like that together?
Of course, even Modern Thought couldn't do it,
unless the subjects belonged together, anyhow, could
it? Unless they were -- er -- er -- --
Well, you know, Affinities. Though I don't care
much for the word.
Affinities have quite gone out, you know. You
don't hear much about Affinities this autumn.
Nor Soul Mates, either, for that matter.
Though I always will say there's an IDEA behind
all the talk about them.
Isn't it odd about things that way -- how Ideas
come and go, you know, and become quite old-
fashioned, and yet all the time have a QUITE
profound Idea back of them?
There's Cubist and Futurist Art, for instance --
one doesn't hear nearly so much about them now,
though everyone admitted there was an Idea
behind them.
Of course, no one knew what the Idea MEANT.
But it was stimulating.
And why should an Idea have to MEAN anything
if it is STIMULATING?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account