Highways of Canadian LiteratureLogan, J. D. (John Daniel)
History
Highways of Canadian Literature
Logan, J. D. (John Daniel)
Canadian literature -- History and criticism
In short, the ‘naturalization’ of a method of humor in dialect—in
America, and the ‘popularization’ of the chief phases of what became
accepted throughout the world as American, though really New England,
humor of thought, speech, and character—that is what is really meant by
saying that Haliburton is the ‘father’ of American humor, and is also
his great achievement so far as he constructively influenced American
(United States) Literature. But it is not his greatest distinction from
the point of view of creative originality.
His prime originality lay neither in his dialect nor in the creation of
his chief character, Sam Slick, but in something which is ultimate and
unique in satiric genius, and which entitles him to a place beside Swift
as a subtle creator of mordant satire. As regards the dialect and the
conversational method of narrative of his chief character Sam Slick, the
variations in morphology and phonetics, and the piquancy and liveliness
of it all convince one that Haliburton independently developed the
dialect or lingo of his humorous characters. But there are facts which
prove that he developed it on a groundwork of a real New England
diction. When we compare, on the one side, the ‘Down East’ dialect of
Seba Smith’s _Letters of Major Downing_ in the Portland _Courier_
(1833-34), which were imitated by Charles Augustus Davis in the New York
_Daily Advertiser_ (1835), and on the other side, the New England
diction in Lowell’s _Biglow Papers_ (Boston _Courier_ 1846-48; _Atlantic
Monthly_ 1862-67), with the diction which Haliburton puts into the mouth
of Sam Slick, we find that Sam Slick’s dialect is more ‘outlandish’ in
morphological and phonetic corruption than the ‘Down East’ diction in
Smith’s and Davis’ _Letters_, but nearer to the New England dialect in
Lowell’s _Biglow Papers_. Lowell, who was a scholar and linguist, and
whose own appreciation of the New England diction is embodied in the
learned disquisitions of Rev. J. Wilbur on dialectical morphology,
certainly would not burlesque and degrade the speech of his fellow
countrymen. The dialect of Lowell’s _Biglow Papers_ must be accepted as
a real, indigenous New England dialect. Haliburton had read Smith’s
_Letters_, which had circulated throughout the Maritime Provinces, and a
New England of ‘Down East’ dialect was familiar in Nova Scotia.
Haliburton’s diction, then, in faithfulness to the real New England
diction, falls midway between the diction in Lowell’s _Biglow Papers_
and the first journalistic forms of that diction as represented in the
_Letters_ of Smith and Davis. Haliburton’s is his conception of that
diction and his independent development of it into a novel humorous
dialect.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account