Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2Eliot, Charles
Religion
Hinduism and Buddhism, An Historical Sketch, Vol. 2
Eliot, Charles
Asia -- Religion; Buddhism; Hinduism
10. One of the sûtras most read in China and admired because its style
has a literary quality unusual in Buddhist works is commonly known as
the Lêng-yen-ching. The full title is Shou-lêng-yen-san-mei-ching
which is the Chinese transliteration of Śûrangama Samâdhi.[143] This
sutra is quoted by name in the Śikshâsamuccaya and fragments of the
Sanskrit text have been found in Turkestan.[144] The Śûrangama-Samâdhi
Sûtra has been conjectured to be the same as the Samâdhirâja, but the
accounts of Rajendralala Mitra and Beal do not support this theory.
Beal's translation leaves the impression that it resembles a Pali
sutta. The scene is laid in the Jetavana with few miraculous
accessories. The Buddha discusses with Ânanda the location of the soul
and after confuting his theories expounds the doctrine of the
Dharma-kâya. The fragments found in Turkestan recommend a particular
form of meditation.
11. Târanâtha informs us that among the many Mahayanist works which
appeared in the reign of Kanishka's son was the Ratnakûṭa-dharma-paryâya
in 1000 sections and the Ratnakûṭa is cited not only by the
Śikshâsamuccaya but by Asanga.[145] The Tibetan and Chinese
canons contain sections with this name comprising forty-eight
or forty-nine items among which are the three important treatises
about Amitâbha's paradise and many dialogues called Paripṛicchâ, that
is, questions put by some personage, human or superhuman, and
furnished with appropriate replies.[146] The Chinese Ratnakûṭa is
said to have been compiled by Bodhiruchi (693-713 A.D.) but of course
he is responsible only for the selection not for the composition of
the works included. Section 14 of this Ratnakûṭa is said to be
identical with chapters 11 and 12 of the Mûlasarvâstivâdin
Vinaya.[147]
12. The Guṇa-kâraṇḍa-vyûha and Kâraṇḍa-vyûha are said to be two
recensions of the same work, the first in verse the second in prose.
Both are devoted to the praise of Avalokita who is represented as the
presiding deity of the universe. He has refused to enter Buddhahood
himself until all living creatures attain to true knowledge and is
specially occupied in procuring the release of those who suffer in
hell. The Guṇa-kâraṇḍa-vyûha contains a remarkable account of the
origin of the world which is said to be absent from the prose version.
The primeval Buddha spirit, Âdi-Buddha or Svayambhû, produces
Avalokita by meditation, and Avalokita produces the material world and
the gods of Hinduism from his body, Śiva from his forehead, Nârâyaṇa
from his heart and so on. As such doctrines are not known to have
appeared in Indian Buddhism before the tenth century it seems probable
that the versified edition is late. But a work with the title
Ratna-kâraṇḍaka-vyûha-sûtra was translated into Chinese in 270 and
the Kâraṇḍa-vyûha is said to have been the first work translated
into Tibetan.[148]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account