History of English Literature Volume 3 (of 3)Taine, Hippolyte
History
History of English Literature Volume 3 (of 3)
Taine, Hippolyte
English literature -- History and criticism
A sad life, most often the life of the men in advance of their age; it
is not wholesome to go too quick. Burns was so much in advance that it
took forty years to catch him. At this time in England the conservatives
and the believers took the lead before sceptics and revolutionists. The
constitution was liberal, and seemed to be a guarantee of rights; the
church was popular, and seemed to be the support of morality. Practical
capacity and speculative incapacity turned the mind aside from the
propounded innovations, and bound them down to the established order.
The people found themselves well off in their great feudal house,
widened and accommodated to modern needs; they thought it beautiful,
they were proud of it; and national instinct, like public opinion,
declared against the innovators who would throw it down to build it up
again. Suddenly a violent shock changed this instinct into a passion,
and this opinion into fanaticism. The French Revolution, at first
admired as a sister, had shown itself a fury and a monster. Pitt
declared in Parliament, "that one of the leading features of this
(French) Government was the extinction of religion and the destruction
of property."[92] Amidst universal applause, the whole thinking and
influential class rose to stamp out this party of robbers, united
brigands, atheists on principle; Jacobinism, sprung from blood to sit in
purple, was persecuted even in its child and champion, "Buonaparte, who
is now the sole organ of all that was formerly dangerous and pestiferous
in the revolution."[93] Under this national rage liberal ideas dwindled;
the most illustrious friends of Fox--Burke, Windham, Spencer--abandoned
him: out of a hundred and sixty partisans in the House of Commons, only
fifty remained to him. The great Whig party seemed to be disappearing;
and in 1799, the strongest minority that could be collected against the
Government was twenty-nine. Yet English Jacobinism was taken by the
throat and held down:
"The Habeas Corpus Act was repeatedly suspended.... Writers who
propounded doctrines adverse to monarchy and aristocracy, were
proscribed and punished without mercy. It was hardly safe for a
republican to avow his political creed over his beefsteak and his bottle
of port at a chophouse.... Men of cultivated mind and polished manners
were (in Scotland), for offences which at Westminster would have been
treated as mere misdemeanours, sent to herd with felons at Botany
Bay."[94]
But the intolerance of the nation aggravated that of the Government. If
anyone had dared to avow democratic sentiments, he would have been
insulted. The papers represented the innovators as wretches and public
enemies. The mob in Birmingham burned the houses of Priestley and the
Unitarians. And in the end Priestley was obliged to leave England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account