C. Müller thinks (in his Annotatio ad Marmor Parium, appended to
the Fragmenta Historicorum Græcorum, ed. Didot, pp. 556, 568,
572; compare his Prefatory notice of the Fragments of Hellanikus,
p. xxviii. of the same volume) that the ancient chronologists,
in their arrangement of the mythical events as antecedent and
consequent, were guided by certain numerical attachments,
especially by a reverence for the cycle of 63 years, product
of the sacred numbers 7 × 9 = 63. I cannot think that he makes
out his hypothesis satisfactorily, as to the particular cycle
followed, though it is not improbable that some preconceived
numerical theories _did_ guide these early calculators. He calls
attention to the fact that the Alexandrine computation of dates
was only one among a number of others discrepant, and that modern
inquirers are too apt to treat it as if it stood alone, or
carried some superior authority, (pp. 568-572; compare Clemen.
Alex. Stromat. i. p. 145, Sylb.) For example, O. Müller observes,
(Appendix to Hist. of Dorians, p. 442,) that “Larcher’s criticism
and rejection of the Alexandrine chronologists may perhaps be
found as groundless as they are presumptuous,”—an observation,
which, to say the least of it, ascribes to Eratosthenês a far
higher authority than he is entitled to.
“The following Table (says Mr. Clinton) offers a summary view of
the leading periods from Phorôneus to the Olympiad of Corœbus, and
exhibits a double series of dates; the one proceeding from the
date of Eratosthenês, the other from a date founded on the reduced
calculations of Phanias and Kallimachus, which strike out fifty-six
years from the amount of Eratosthenês. Phanias, as we have seen,
omitted fifty-five years between the Return and the registered
Olympiads; for so we may understand the account: Kallimachus,
fifty-six years between the Olympiad of Iphitus and the Olympiad in
which Corœbus won.[71]
[71] The date of Kallimachus for _Iphitus_ is approved by Clavier
(Prem. Temps, tom. ii. p. 203), who considers it as not far from
the truth.
“The first column of this Table exhibits the _current_ years before
and after the fall of Troy: in the second column of dates the
_complete_ intervals are expressed.”
Years
Years intervening
before between
the Fall the different B. C. B. C.
of Troy. events. Eratosth. Kallimach.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account