fortune, satisfied discerning men that he would reimburse himself
by plundering the public, and even, if opportunity offered, by
overthrowing[62] the constitution to make himself master of the
persons and properties of his fellow-citizens. He never inspired
confidence or esteem in any one; and sooner or later, among a public
like that of Athens, so much accumulated odium and suspicion was sure
to bring a public man to ruin, in spite of the strongest admiration
for his capacity. He was always the object of very conflicting
sentiments: “The Athenians desired him, hated him, but still
wished to have him,” was said in the latter years of his life by a
contemporary poet; while we find also another pithy precept delivered
in regard to him: “You ought not to keep a lion’s whelp in your city
at all; but, if you choose to keep him, you must submit yourself to
his behavior.”[63] Athens had to feel the force of his energy, as an
exile and enemy, but the great harm which he did to her was in his
capacity of adviser; awakening in his countrymen the same thirst for
showy, rapacious, uncertain, perilous aggrandizement which dictated
his own personal actions.
[60] Cornel. Nepos, Alkibiad. c. 1; Satyrus apud Athenæum, xii,
p. 534; Plutarch, Alkibiad. c. 23.
Οὗ γὰρ τοιούτων δεῖ, τοιοῦτος εἰμ’ ἐγώ, says Odysseus, in the
Philoktêtês of Sophoklês.
[61] I follow the criticism which Plutarch cites from
Theophrastus, seemingly discriminating and measured: much
more trustworthy than the vague eulogy of Nepos, or even of
Demosthenês (of course not from his own knowledge), upon the
eloquence of Alkibiadês (Plutarch, Alkib. c. 10); Plutarch,
Reipubl. Gerend. Præcept. c. 8, p. 804.
Antisthenês, companion and pupil of Sokratês, and originator of
what is called the Cynic philosophy, contemporary and personally
acquainted with Alkibiadês, was full of admiration for his
extreme personal beauty, and pronounced him to be strong, manly,
and audacious, but unschooled, ~ἀπαίδευτον~. His scandals about
the lawless life of Alkibiadês, however, exceed what we can
reasonably admit, even from a contemporary (Antisthenês ap.
Athenæum, v, p. 220, xii, p. 534). Antisthenês had composed a
dialogue called Alkibiadês (Diog. Laërt. vi, 15).
See the collection of the Fragmenta Antisthenis (by A. G.
Winckelmann, Zurich, 1842, pp. 17-19).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account