As the Kshatrapa year 60 (A.D. 138) has been taken to be the date of close of Chashtana's reign, and as five years may be allowed for the short reign [124] of Jayadáman, the beginning of the reign of Rudradáman may be supposed to have been about the year 65 (A.D. 143). This Girnár inscription gives 72 as the year in which Rudradáman was then reigning and it is fair to suppose that he reigned probably up to 80. The conclusion is that Rudradáman ruled from A.D. 143 to 158. [125] [Kshatrapa V. Dámázada or Dámájadasrí, A.D. 158-168.] Rudradáman was succeeded by his son Dámázada or Dámájadasrí regarding whom all the information available is obtained from six coins obtained by Dr. Bhagvánlál. [126] The workmanship of all six coins is good, after the type of Rudradáman's coins. On the obverse is a bust in the same style as Rudradáman's and round the bust is an illegible Greek legend. Like Rudradáman's coins these have no dates, a proof of their antiquity, as all later Kshatrapa coins have dates in Nágarí numerals. The reverse has the usual sun and moon and between them the arched symbol with the zigzag under-line. Around them in three specimens is the following legend in old Nágarí: Rájño Mahákshatrapasa Rudradámaputrasa [127] Rájñah Kshatrapasa Dámáysadasa. Of the king the Kshatrapa Dámázada [128] son of the king the Kshatrapa Rudradáman. The legend on the other three is: Rájño Mahákshatrapasa Rudradámnahputrasa Rájñah Kshatrapasa Dámájadasriyah. Of the king the Kshatrapa Dámájadasrí son of the king the great Kshatrapa Rudradáma. Dámázada and Dámájadasrí seem to be two forms of the same name, Dámázada with ysa for Z being the name first struck, and Dámájadasrí, with the ordinary ja for Z, and with Srí added to adorn the name and make it more euphonic, being the later form. It will be noted that, except by his son Jivadáman, Dámázada or Dámájadasrí is not called a Mahákshatrapa but simply a Kshatrapa. His coins are very rare. The six mentioned are the only specimens known and are all from one find. He may therefore be supposed to have reigned as heir-apparent during the life-time of Rudradáman, or it is possible that he may have suffered loss of territory and power. His reign seems to have been short and may have terminated about 90 that is A.D. 168 or a little later.