History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
The tendencies of bodies downwards and upwards, their weight, their
fall, their floating or sinking, were thus accounted for in a manner
which, however unsound, satisfied the greater part of the
speculative world till the time of Galileo and Stevinus, though
Archimedes in the mean time published the true theory of floating
bodies, which is very different from that above stated. Other parts
of the doctrines of motion were delivered by the Stagirite in the
same spirit and with the same success. The motion of a body which is
thrown along the {71} ground diminishes and finally ceases; the
motion of a body which falls from a height goes on becoming quicker
and quicker; this was accounted for on the usual principle of
opposition, by saying that the former is a _violent_, the latter a
_natural_ motion. And the later writers of this school expressed the
characters of such motions in verse. The rule of natural motion
was[26\1]
Principium tepeat, medium cum fine calebit.
Cool at the first, it warm and warmer glows.
And of violent motion, the law was--
Principium fervet, medium calet, ultima friget.
Hot at the first, then barely warm, then cold.
[Note 26\1: Alsted. Encyc. tom. i. p. 687.]
It appears to have been considered by Aristotle a difficult problem
to explain why a stone thrown from the hand continues to move for
some time, and then stops. If the hand was the cause of the motion,
how could the stone move at all when left to itself? if not, why
does it ever stop? And he answers this difficulty by saying,[27\1]
"that there is a motion communicated to the air, the successive
parts of which urge the stone onwards; and that each part of this
medium continues to act for some while after it has been acted on,
and the motion ceases when it comes to a particle which cannot act
after it has ceased to be acted on." It will be readily seen that
the whole of this difficulty, concerning a body which moves forward
and is retarded till it stops, arises from ascribing the
retardation, not to the real cause, the surrounding resistances, but
to the body itself.
[Note 27\1: Phys. Ausc. viii. 10.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account