History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present timeWhewell, William
History
History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time
Whewell, William
Science -- History
The same may be said of the physical speculations of the other
schools of philosophy. They arrived at no doctrines from which they
could deduce, by sound reasoning, such facts as they saw; though
they {82} often venture so far to trust their principles as to infer
from them propositions beyond the domain of sense. Thus, the
principle that each element seeks _its own place_, led to the
doctrine that, the place of fire being the highest, there is, above
the air, a Sphere of Fire--of which doctrine the word _Empyrean_,
used by our poets, still conveys a reminiscence. The Pythagorean
tenet that ten is a perfect number,[49\1] led some persons to assume
that the heavenly bodies are in number ten; and as nine only were
known to them, they asserted that there was an _antichthon_, or
_counter-earth_, on the other side of the sun, invisible to us.
Their opinions respecting numerical ratios, led to various other
speculations concerning the distances and positions of the heavenly
bodies: and as they had, in other cases, found a connection between
proportions of distance and musical notes, they assumed, on this
suggestion, _the music of the spheres_.
[Note 49\1: Arist. Metaph. i. 5.]
Although we shall look in vain in the physical philosophy of the
Greek Schools for any results more valuable than those just
mentioned, we shall not be surprised to find, recollecting how much
an admiration for classical antiquity has possessed the minds of
men, that some writers estimate their claims much more highly than
they are stated here. Among such writers we may notice Dutens, who,
in 1766, published his "Origin of the Discoveries attributed to the
Moderns; in which it is shown that our most celebrated Philosophers
have received the greatest part of their knowledge from the Works of
the Ancients." The thesis of this work is attempted to be proved, as
we might expect, by very large interpretations of the general
phrases used by the ancients. Thus, when Timæus, in Plato's
dialogue, says of the Creator of the world,[50\1] "that he infused
into it two powers, the origins of motions, both of that of the same
thing and of that of different things;" Dutens[51\1] finds in this a
clear indication of the projectile and attractive forces of modern
science. And in some of the common declamation of the Pythagoreans
and Platonists concerning the general prevalence of numerical
relations in the universe, he discovers their acquaintance with the
law of the inverse square of the distance by which gravitation is
regulated, though he allows[52\1] that it required all the
penetration of Newton and his followers to detect this law in the
scanty fragments by which it is transmitted.
[Note 50\1: Tim. 96.]
[Note 51\1: 3d ed. p. 83.]
[Note 52\1: Ib. p. 88.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account