History of the Kingdom of Siam and of the revolutions that have caused the overthrow of the empire, up to A.D. 1770Turpin, F. H. (François Henri)
History
History of the Kingdom of Siam and of the revolutions that have caused the overthrow of the empire, up to A.D. 1770
Turpin, F. H. (François Henri)
Thailand -- Description and travel; Thailand -- History
A zealot for the religion of his country he showed that he was jealous
of the praises showered upon the Bishop of Tabraca, who, was regarded
as a heavenly messenger sent to reform their morals. The respect given
to the worshipper and minister of a foreign God appeared to the
Monarch to be a slight on the national religion.
He commanded that European titles only should be used as honorable
appellations in his his case, and to suppress all Siamese words by
which respect and greatness were indicated.
The order was by no means universally obeyed. The nobility and the
people never ceased showing forth their regard for the Bishop and
continued to load him with titles which he preferred to deserve rather
than to receive.
This enmity engendered by jealousy would not have been productive of
evil results as the Prince was weak rather than evil-minded. It seemed
that peace would continue, but soon the State was plunged into a new
commotion. The King pronounced sentence of death against a favourite
of his brother's who was suspected of having carried on treasonable
correspondence with the enemy. This decree was regarded as an abuse of
his authority. The people demanded that account should be rendered of
the blood shed on slight grounds of suspicion. A general discontent
made the King re-enter the priesthood, and he appeared to abdicate the
throne with more pleasure than he had ascended it. His elder brother
became King, and the position which he thus occupied, showed up his
vices and follies to the full light of day.
In May 1762 the Prince resigned the crown in favour of the priesthood.
A great number of Siamese followed his example. The State was burdened
with an excess of useless citizens who kept aloof from those they
ought to have served. Sorcery and magic were the principal topics of
conversation, everyone had formulae for the compounding of love
philters for immoral purposes, and the secret of rendering the person
invisible for the purpose of robbery and assassination without fear of
punishment, was the universal object of research.
The priests who had become more haughty since the King had entered
their order, demanded that they should receive divine honours. The
ignorant populace wasted their substance in their support, and kept
them in idleness. These holy ministers, naturally poor, found abundant
means of livelihood in the folly of the vulgar, an inexhaustible ever
ready source of supplies for the use of impostors. Not even was their
moral character an object of respect. They frequently gave rise to
many scandalous scenes and, immune from punishment, they would not
even cast a veil over the filthy pleasures to which they were
addicted. By greed and cunning they obtained possession of everything
that could not be appropriated by force.
The reigning King gave precedent for these irregularities by his
example.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account