The Spaniards possessed but little more military skill than their
Moslem neighbours; but their infantry, at least, could attack and
resist in mass, while the discipline of that of the Saracens amounted
to scarcely anything. On the other hand, again, the cavalry of the
Moors was admirably trained. The cavaliers who composed it belonged to
the principal families in the kingdom, and possessed excellent horses,
in the art of managing which they had been trained from childhood.
Their mode of combat was to rush forward with the rapidity of light,
strike with the sabre or the lance, fly away as quickly, and then wheel
suddenly and return again to the {108} encounter. Thus they often
succeeded in recalling victory to their standard when she seemed just
about to desert them. The Christians, covered as they were with iron,
had in some respects the advantage of these knights, whose persons were
protected only by a breastplate and headpiece of steel. The Moorish
foot-soldiers were nearly naked, and armed only with a wretched pike.
It is easy to perceive that, when involved in the _melee_, and, above
all, during a route, vast numbers of them must have perished. This,
too, renders less incredible the seemingly extravagant accounts given
by historians of their losses in the field. They assert, for example,
that, at the battle of Toloza, the Christians killed two hundred
thousand Moors, while they lost themselves but fifteen hundred
soldiers. Even when these assertions are estimated at their true
value, it remains certain that the infidels sustained an immense loss;
and this important defeat, which is still celebrated yearly at Toledo
by a solemn fete, long deprived the kings of Morocco of all hope of
subjugating the Spaniards.
The victory of Toloza was followed by more fatal consequences to the
unfortunate Mohammed than to the Moors of Andalusia; for the {109}
latter retired to their cities, defended them by means of the remains
of the African army, and successfully resisted the Spanish princes, who
succeeded in taking but few of their strong places, and, speedily
dissolving their league, separated for their respective kingdoms. But
Mohammed, despised by his subjects after his defeat, and assailed by
the treachery of his nearest relations, lost all authority in Spain,
and beheld the principal Moors, whom he had now no power to control,
again forming little states, the independence of which they were
prepared to assert by force of arms.[7] The discomfited El Nazir
consequently returned to Africa, where he soon after died of chagrin.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account