History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 1: With Notices of Its Principle FramersCurtis, George Ticknor
History
History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States, Vol. 1: With Notices of Its Principle Framers
Curtis, George Ticknor
Constitutional history -- United States
The circumstances which attended the appointment of
Washington to this great command are now quite well known. He
had been a member of the Congress of 1774, and his military
experience and accomplishments, and the great resources of
his character, had caused his appointment on all the
committees charged with making preparations for the defence
of the colonies. Returned as a delegate from Virginia to the
Congress of 1775, his personal qualifications pointed him out
as the fittest person in the whole country to be invested
with the command of any army which the United Colonies might
see fit to raise; and it is quite certain that there would
have been no hesitation about the appointment, if some
political considerations had not been suggested as obstacles.
At the moment when the choice was to be made, the scene of
actual operations was in Massachusetts, where an army
composed of troops wholly raised by the New England colonies,
and under the command of General Ward, of that Province, was
besieging the enemy in Boston. This army was to be adopted by
the Congress into the service of the continent, and serious
doubts were entertained by some of the members of the
Congress as to the policy of appointing a Southern general to
the command of it, and a good deal of delicacy was felt on
account of General Ward, who, it was thought, might consider
himself injured by such an appointment. On the other hand,
there were strong reasons for selecting a general-in-chief
from Virginia. That colony had taken the lead, among the
Southern provinces, in the cause of the continent, and the
appointment seemed to be due to her, if it was to be made
upon political considerations. The motives for this policy
were deemed sufficient to outweigh the objections arising
from the character and situation of the army which the
general would, in the first instance, have to command. But
after all, it cannot be doubted, that the preëminent
qualifications of Washington had far more weight with the
majority of the Congress, than any dictates of mere policy,
between one part of the Union and another, or any local
jealousies or sectional ambition.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account