History of the Origin of Representative Government in EuropeGuizot, François
History
History of the Origin of Representative Government in Europe
Guizot, François
Europe -- History; Representative government and representation
The ceorls, then, were Saxons, and were distinguished from the
ancient inhabitants of the country. It is impossible that so
large a proportion of the conquerors should have fallen so
quickly into servitude. We may rather feel astonished that they
had no landed property in the country, which they had just
conquered. But Tacitus, with the accustomed truthfulness and
vigour of his pencil, makes us readily understand this
circumstance. In the forests of Germany, the barbarian warriors
always lived around their chieftains, who had to suggest and
command expeditions in times of activity, and to lodge and
support their men in times of repose. The same habits were kept
up after the conquest of a country; the property acquired was not
divided among all the victors. Every chieftain received a larger
or smaller division of land, and his followers settled with him
upon it. These men, accustomed to a wandering life, did not yet
set a high value upon landed property. Being still harassed,
moreover, by the ancient possessors of the soil, they found it
necessary to keep together, and unite in their own defence. They
formed species of camps around the dwelling of their chieftain,
whose possessions, according to the ancient Saxon laws, were
divided into two parts--_inlands_ and _outlands_. And
it is clear proof of the great difference then existing between
the ceorls and the slaves, that the latter alone cultivated the
land adjoining the habitation of the chief, while the ceorls, as
a natural consequence of their personal freedom, tilled the
outlands. This state of things, however, could not last long. A
large number of the ceorls fell into servitude, and assumed the
name of _villeins_ (villani); while others acquired lands
for themselves, and became the _soc-men_ of England.
{38}
Summing up what we have said, we perceive, in the state of
persons under the Anglo-Saxon monarchy, one great division into
freemen and slaves: and, among the freemen, another distinction
of thanes and ceorls. The thanes themselves are subdivided into
king's thanes and inferior thanes. The former are large landed
proprietors, the latter hold smaller estates; but both classes
possess equal rights. The ceorls are freemen, without landed
property, at least originally. Most of them fall into a state of
servitude. With regard to the slaves, we can say nothing except
that they were very numerous, and were divided into domestic
servants and rural serfs, or serfs of the glebe. The ancient
inhabitants of the country did not all fall into servitude; some
of them retained their possessions, and a law of King Ina
authorized them to appear before courts of justice. They might
even pass into the class of thanes if they possessed five hides
of land.
The thanes alone, to speak truly, played an active part in
history.
_Local Institutions._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account