History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal EngineersConnolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
History
History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal Engineers
Connolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Sappers and Miners
This was on the 22nd May, 1802. The account given at the time of this
disgraceful act is as follows:—“A dreadful fire broke out at Woolwich,
and from the investigation which has taken place into this calamitous
circumstance, there is but too much reason to believe that this
disaster was not the mere effect of accident. The fire broke out, at
one and the same time, in three different places, besides which a
great mass of combustible materials have been discovered. The loss to
Government will be immense. The damage done to the Model-room is
particularly to be lamented, as several choice works of art have been
destroyed, without the power of reparation; however, the injury done
to the beautiful model of the rock of Gibraltar is not so great as was
at first represented, it having sustained but a slight damage, which
can be easily repaired, and the whole restored to its original
state.”—Dodsley’s Annual Register, 1802, p. 404. The journalist is
wrong in his remarks concerning the state of the model after the fire.
It was completely destroyed, and not even the fragments are now in
existence. Some persons, indeed, with whom I have conversed, bear out
the chronicler in his record, and affirm that the model was repaired,
and _is now_ in the Rotunda; but they have given me a fair inference
of the mistaken character of their recollections, by uniformly
referring to the model of the _north front_, executed by Richmond and
Marques, which, at the very time that the fire occurred, formed one of
the curiosities of Buckingham Palace. Drinkwater (p. 108, Murray’s
edit.) attests the fact of its destruction; and in this he is borne
out by the ‘Repository Detail of Arms,’ &c., printed in 1822. In that
catalogue (at p. 9-21) is a list of the arms, models, &c., of the
_original_ institution preserved from the fire of 1802, and collected
by Sir William Congreve, but no mention is made of the model in
question. This, then, is the best attainable evidence of the certainty
of its demolition, coupled with the acknowledgment, at page 52 of the
same catalogue, that the “North end of Gibraltar,” the model mistaken
for the one destroyed in the Arsenal, was presented to the Repository
by George IV. Had the large model of the Rock been preserved, Sir
William Congreve would most certainly have noted it in the detail.
-----
1783.
State of the fortress—Execution of the works depended upon
the company—Casualties filled up by transfers from the
line—Composition—Recruiting—Relieved from all duties, garrison and
regimental—Anniversary of the destruction of the Spanish battering
flotilla.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account