History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
and when the men undismayed by the defeat of the right, demanded to
be led into action, he commanded a retreat, and quitted the field
himself at the moment when his presence was most wanted.
6º. The combinations of the French were methodical, well arranged,
effectual, and it may seem misplaced, to do ought but commend
movements so eminently successful. Yet the chances of war are
manifold enough to justify the drawing attention to some points
of this short campaign. Areizaga’s burst from the mountains was
so unexpected and rapid, that it might well make his adversaries
hesitate; and hence perhaps the reason why the first corps circled
round the Spanish army, and was singly to have attacked the latter in
front at Zarza, on the 19th; whereas, reinforced with the division
of the fourth corps from Toledo, it might have fallen on the rear
and flank from Mora a week before. That is, during the three days
Areizaga remained at Dos Barrios, from whence Mora is only four hours
march.
7º. The 11th, the king knew the English army had not approached the
valley of the Tagus; Areizaga only quitted Dos Barrios the 13th, and
he remained at Zarza until the 18th. During eight days therefore,
the Spanish general was permitted to lead, and had he been a man
of real enterprise he would have crushed the troops between Dos
Barrios and Aranjuez on the 10th or 11th. Indeed, the boldness with
which Sebastiani maintained his offensive position beyond Aranjuez,
from the 9th to the 14th, was a master-piece. It must, however, be
acknowledged that Soult could not at once fix a general, who marched
fifty thousand men about like a patrole of cavalry, without the
slightest regard to his adversary’s positions or his own line of
operations.
8º. In the battle, nothing could be more scientific than the mode in
which the French closed upon and defeated the right and centre, while
they paralized the left of the Spaniards. The disparity of numbers
engaged, and the enormous amount of prisoners, artillery, and other
trophies of victory prove it to have been a fine display of talent.
But Andalusia was laid prostrate by this sudden destruction of her
troops; why then was the fruit of victory neglected? Did the king,
unable to perceive his advantages, control the higher military
genius of his advising general, or was he distracted by disputes
amongst the different commanders? or, did the British army at Badajos
alarm him? An accurate knowledge of these points is essential in
estimating the real share Spain had in her own deliverance.
[Sidenote: Letter to Lord Liverpool. MS.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account