History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“Marshal Beresford appears to possess a great deal of information
upon all subjects connected with the military establishments of the
kingdom, the departments attached to the army, and the resources of
the country. But nothing appears to be well arranged and digested in
his head; he never fixes upon a point, but deviates from his subject,
and overwhelms a very slender thread of argument by a profusion
of illustrations, stories, and anecdotes, most of which relate to
himself. He is captious and obstinate, and difficult to be pleased.
He appears to grasp at every thing for his own party, without
considering what it would be fair, and reasonable, and decent to
expect from the other party.”
I now take leave of you, my lord, and notwithstanding all that has
passed, I take leave of you with respect, because I think you to
be a brave soldier, and even an able organizer of an army. I know
that you have served your country long, I firmly believe to the
utmost of your ability, and I admit that ability to have been very
considerable; but history, my lord, deals with very great men, and
you sink in the comparison. She will speak of you as a general far
above mediocrity, as one who has done much and a great deal of it
well, yet when she looks at Campo Mayor and Albuera she will not
rank you amongst great commanders, and if she should ever cast her
penetrating eyes upon this your present publication, she will not
class you amongst great writers.
REPLY
TO THE
_Third Article in the Quarterly Review_
ON
COL. NAPIER’S HISTORY OF THE PENINSULAR WAR.
‘Now there are two of them; and one has been called _Crawley_, and
the other is _Honest Iago_.’—OLD PLAY.
This article is the third of its family, and like its predecessors
is only remarkable for malignant imbecility and systematic violation
of truth. The malice is apparent to all; it remains to show the
imbecility and falseness.
The writer complains of my ill-breeding, and with that valour which
belongs to the _incognito_ menaces me with his literary vengeance
for my former comments. His vengeance! Bah! The ass’ ears peep too
far beyond the lion’s hide. He shall now learn that I always adapt
my manners to the level of the person I am addressing; and though
his petty industry indicates a mind utterly incapable of taking an
enlarged view of any subject he shall feel that chastisement awaits
his malevolence. And first with respect to the small sketches in my
work which he pronounces to be the very worst _plans_ possible. It is
expressly stated on the face of each that they are only ‘_Explanatory
Sketches_,’ his observations therefore are a mere ebullition of
contemptible spleen; but I will now show my readers why they are only
sketches and not accurate plans.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account