History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Here I cannot refrain from observing that, in the course of my
labours, I have asked information of many persons of various nations,
even of Spaniards, after my first volume was published, and when
the unfavourable view I took of their exertions was known. And from
Spaniards, Portuguese, English, French, and Germans, whether of high
or low rank, I have invariably met with the greatest kindness, and
found an eager desire to aid me. Sir George Murray only has thrown
obstacles in my way; and if I am rightly informed of the following
circumstance, his opposition has not been confined to what I have
stated above. Mr. Murray, the bookseller, purchased my first volume
with the right of refusal for the second volume. When the latter was
nearly ready a friend informed me that he did not think Murray would
purchase, because he had heard him say that sir George Murray had
declared it was not ‘_The Book_.’ He did not point out any particular
error; but it was not ‘_The Book_;’ meaning doubtless that his own
production, when it appeared, would be ‘_The Book_.’ My friend’s
prognostic was good. I was offered just half of the sum given for
the first volume. I declined it, and published on my own account;
and certainly I have had no reason to regret that Mr. Murray waited
for ‘_The Book_:’ indeed he has since told me very frankly that
he had mistaken his own interest. Now whether three articles in
‘The Quarterly,’ and a promise of more,[9] be a tribute paid to the
importance of ‘_My Book_,’ or whether they be the puff preliminary
to ‘_The Book_,’ I know not; but I am equally bound to Mr. Editor
Lockhart for the distinction, and only wish he had not hired such a
stumbling sore-backed hackney for the work. Quitting this digression,
I return to the Review.
My topographical ignorance is a favourite point with the writer, and
he mentions three remarkable examples on the present occasion:—1.
That I have said Oporto is built in a hollow; 2. That I have placed
the Barca de Avintas only three miles from the Serra Convent, instead
of nine miles; 3. That I have described a ridge of land near Medellin
where no such ridge exists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account