History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
“Langalibalele we release from imprisonment on the island in the sea,
but he shall not return to Natal. The Amahlubi may, if they choose,
when that is prepared which is to be prepared, go to him, but he will
not be allowed to go to the Amahlubi.”
In all that Lord Carnarvon thought fit to say on this occasion he
does not express the slightest approval of any person concerned,
or action taken, except of the “conduct of Colonel Durnford, whose
forbearance and humanity towards the natives” (he says) “has
attracted my attention.” A despatch of the same date (3rd December,
1874) recalls Sir Benjamin Pine from the government of Natal.
Anything more thoroughly condemnatory could hardly be imagined,
although it may be reasonably questioned how far justice was done to
Sir Benjamin Pine[39] by the whole weight of mismanagement being
placed upon his shoulders, while his coadjutor and adviser, Mr.
Shepstone, on whose opinion he had acted throughout, and whose word,
by his supposed knowledge of native ways and character, was law
throughout the affair, was promoted and rewarded.
After perusing Lord Carnarvon’s remarks and directions, my readers
may imagine that some very good result would be produced on the
fortunes of both tribes, but in this supposition they would be
greatly mistaken. Nor, unless they had been in the habit of perusing
South African despatches with attention, would it occur to them how
easily the proclamation quoted from, drawn up by Mr. Shepstone, could
be evaded. The proclamation itself is almost childish in its foolish
way of informing the people that they had behaved very badly, and
deserved all they had got, but would be relieved of their punishment
by the mercy of the Queen, and must behave very well and gratefully
in future. Such exhortations to people who were perfectly aware that
they had been treated with the utmost injustice were rather likely
to raise secret contempt than respect in the minds of an intelligent
people, who would have far better understood an honest declaration
that “we have punished you, under the impression that you had done
what we find you did not do, and will therefore make it up to you as
much as possible.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account