Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
The Republican party gave us a plank in their platform in 1872,
pledging themselves to a "respectful consideration" of our
demands. But by their constitutional interpretations, legislative
enactments, and judicial decisions, so far from redeeming their
pledge, they have buried our petitions and appeals under laws in
direct opposition to their high-sounding promises and
professions. And now (1876) they give us another plank in their
platform, approving the "substantial advance made toward the
establishment of equal rights for women"; cunningly reminding us
that the privileges and immunities we now enjoy are all due to
Republican legislation--although, under a Republican dynasty,
inspectors of election have been arrested and imprisoned for
taking the votes of women; temperance women arrested and
imprisoned for praying in the streets; houses, lands, bonds, and
stock of women seized and sold for their refusal to pay unjust
taxation--and, more than all, we have this singular spectacle: a
Republican woman, who had spoken for the Republican party
throughout the last presidential campaign, arrested by Republican
officers for voting the Republican ticket, denied the right of
trial by jury by a Republican judge, convicted and sentenced to a
fine of one hundred dollars and costs of prosecution; and all
this for asserting at the polls the most sacred of all the rights
of American citizenship--the right of suffrage--specifically
secured by recent Republican amendments to the federal
constitution.
Again, the Supreme Court of the United States, by its recent
decision in the Minor-Happersett case, has stultified its own
interpretation of constitutional law. A negro, by virtue of his
United States citizenship, is declared under recent amendments a
voter in every State in the Union; but when a woman, by virtue of
her United States citizenship, applies to the Supreme Court for
protection in the exercise of this same right, she is remanded to
the State by the unanimous decision of the nine judges on the
bench, that "the Constitution of the United States does not
confer the right of suffrage upon any one."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account